As a possibility you could summarize and then downstream peers will just
see a regular internal route that you can act upon...
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 9:09 PM, gp <gs4me2me_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, only with tags as I can see it will work, but in complex network it's
> a
> lot of works to doJ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Steve Di Bias [mailto:sdibias_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 11:59 AM
> To: gp
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: eigrp - filtering external routes
>
>
>
> You can modify the AD value for external EIGRP routes, however it's for all
> of them I'm afraid. I too have come across scenarios where changing the
> distance a per prefix basis would have been nice.
>
>
>
> router eigrp x
>
> distance eigrp 90 201
>
>
>
> Other than that you can use distribute-lists or offset-lists, and you could
> filter on tags, etc.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 2:43 AM, gp <gs4me2me_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> Does anyone know why we cannot filter eigrp external routes with distance
> command?
>
>
>
> And is there any other way to influence external routes except with metric?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> Gp
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> -Steve Di Bias
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Nov 27 2011 - 21:29:48 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Dec 01 2011 - 06:29:32 ART