RE: OER help

I believe if the routes are advertised to all routers in d domain, the forwarding of routes will not depend on the border routers alone.
I believe in aspect of link group,since there is no routes been injected, just tagged, that is based more on the border router, creating a tunnel can only be done if we were ask to.
-----Original message-----
From: engrenny_at_hotmail.com
Sent: 20/11/2011, 7:28 am
To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com; Ray
Subject: RE: OER help

To clear my doubt, if the MC inject either a static or bgp route into the border router routing table, is the route advertise only to the border routers or to all routers in our domain?

The reason i ask this is that in doc-cd, it is been stated that we should make sure to redistribute static into igp or bgp if either one is what we are using.
-----Original message-----
From: Ray
Sent: 20/11/2011, 7:06 am
To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: OER help

hi

I am running OER on Core router and 2 branch routers
Core router is configured master, and branch routers as border routers,
authentication is being used.
i read some where that the remote border router should be a single hop
away or a tunnel interface that makes the remote border router look like a
single hop. ...
can some one explain this? I want master router to optimize voice traffic,
and to do active probe for specific range for prefixes like x.x.x.0/16 to
x.xx.0/16 with dscp ef

Also i am trying to achieve... packets with particular dscp value to go
from branch1 router and packets with other different dscp value to go
though branch2 router...
how can i match this .... access-list or prefix list. how can i do using
single access-list if i want to?

Ray

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Nov 20 2011 - 06:44:50 ART