I also agree w/ Frog and Joe..
Sha is more secure because have more bits in a hash.
Rgs,
2011/11/15 Joe Astorino <joeastorino1982_at_gmail.com>
> I agree with frog...I'd go with the strongest SHA hash I could find.
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Oh ic... what u mean.
> > in that case the more bits a hash contains , the more secure.
> > MD5 = 128 bits
> > Sha = goes upto 512 bits (sha0,1,2).
> >
> > in that sense SHA as others have mentioned.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Sandaka Ranatunga <
> > sandakaranatunga_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi ,
> > >
> > > My requirement is this.
> > >
> > > I am going to configure OSPFv3 between a few routers.
> > >
> > > Question says to use most secure Authentication method.
> > >
> > > This is the link to Cisco Config Guide
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ip6-ospf_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1070239
> > >
> > > We can use either MD5 or SHA.
> > >
> > > Out of above 2 what is the most secure method?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanx
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Sandaka
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Joe Astorino
> CCIE #24347
> Blog: http://astorinonetworks.com
>
> "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Alessandro Braga CCIE #30939 Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Wed Nov 16 2011 - 00:52:53 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Dec 01 2011 - 06:29:31 ART