Re: Here's a good OSPF question

Alternative: Instead of SVI's is it possible to make the cross switch link
an L3 etherchannel instead? Then you could run OSPF directly on the
etherchannel and the cost would dynamically change with the bandwidth of
the etherchannel

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Joe Astorino <joeastorino1982_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Not that I know of, other than like you said an EEM hack or something.
> The bandwidth will strictly be based on the OSPF cost of the L3 interface,
> which is derived from the bandwidth of the interface OSPF is running on by
> default or by the "ip ospf cost" interface command.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Michael Kiefer <mjkiefer_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I have some switches with 802.1Q port-channels between them. Routing is
>> done on the SVIs of the switches.
>>
>> Is there anyway other than EEM or some hack to make OSPF cost of the SVI
>> adjust based on the bandwidth of the underlying 802.1Q layer 2 port
>> channels?
>>
>> AFAIK, the answer is "no".
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Joe Astorino
> CCIE #24347
> Blog: http://astorinonetworks.com
>
> "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Joe Astorino
CCIE #24347
Blog: http://astorinonetworks.com
"He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net