Re: BGP neighborship problem

Set the neighbor with ebgp-multihop on each end. Default is TTL of one unless you increase it. I'm assuming ebgp.

Regards,
Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP
Sent from my iPhone
http://mycciepursuit.wordpress.com

On Oct 15, 2011, at 11:16 AM, "Tolulope Ogunsina" <togunsina_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> If you do "show ip route <neigh-ip-address>", you would find "subnet not in table"
>
> For the neighbor relationship to form, you need a route with a length greater than 0.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Tolulope Ogunsina.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCIE KID <eliteccie_at_gmail.com>
> Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 21:38:11
> To: Cisco certification<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Reply-To: CCIE KID <eliteccie_at_gmail.com>
> Subject: BGP neighborship problem
>
> Hi fellas,
>
> I have a simple topology R1----------------------------R2 R1 is
> forming neighbourship with R2's loopback and viceversa. I have a default
> route configured to reach loopback.
> Why BGP cant form a neighbourship with a peer with a default route? Why it
> needs a unicast exact route to form a peer?
> What is the logic behind this ? Can anyone explain me the logic?
>
> --
> With Warmest Regards,
>
> CCIE KID
> CCIE#29992 (Security)
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Oct 15 2011 - 19:34:57 ART