Re: BGP to OSPF Redistribution w/ Sham-Link

From: Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:23:41 -0700

What happened when you labbed it up? Did it work? :-)

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:09, Yuri Bank <yuribank_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm curious if this is really necessary? I've done this in my lab and it
> seems to work fine. I understand that you MUST redistribute OSPF into BGP on
> your PE, so that appropriate VPN labels are advertised to the remote PE.
> However, I see no reason to redistribute BGP into OSPF, since the LSAs are
> getting advertised through the sham-link, and the CE routers will have a
> complete LinkState Database from that.
>
> Is there anything that I'm missing?
>
> -Yuri
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Oct 11 2011 - 11:23:41 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 15 2011 - 13:10:29 ART