Re: STP cost over Portchannel links

From: Routing Freak <routingfreak_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:14:42 +0530

Hi Martin,

I didnt got any lists dude

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Martin Schumacher <
martin1.schumacher_at_googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> here is the list with the PVST+ Path Costs:
>
>
>
> Greetings
>
> Martin
>
>
> 2011/10/11 Routing Freak <routingfreak_at_gmail.com>
>
>> Hi martin,
>>
>> I am using normal PVST+ and i am not spanning-tree pathcost command. All
>> the defaults are present just as usual.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Martin Schumacher <
>> martin1.schumacher_at_googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> it depends. :-)
>>>
>>> Which Spanning-Tree Protocol are you using and have you configured
>>> "spanning-tree pathcost method long"?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2011/10/11 Routing Freak <routingfreak_at_gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> Hi friends,
>>>>
>>>> I have quick question regarding STP cost on Port channel links. If I
>>>> have
>>>> 2 gigabit ethernet links bundled together . What is the value of cost
>>>> in
>>>> STP output. Sorry I dont have any switches with me to check it right
>>>> now? .
>>>> So can anyone tell me the value of the cost of the STP port channel
>>>> link.
>>>>
>>>> Thank You.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Oct 11 2011 - 14:14:42 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 15 2011 - 13:10:29 ART