no secondary concept in ipv6
and ipv6 eigrp is going to use link-local to communicate
-- Garry L. Baker "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine..." - RFC 1925 On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Marcelo Pinheiro <marcelo_at_academiacisco.com.br> wrote: > For routing purpose, it is not necessary. > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Manouchehr Omari > <manouchehr1979_at_gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> Do you have the command "secondary" in IPv6? >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Marcelo Pinheiro < >> marcelo_at_academiacisco.com.br> wrote: >> >>> With IPv6 it is possible. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Manouchehr Omari < >>> manouchehr1979_at_gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> No you cannot. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:58 PM, amin <amin_at_axizo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi experts, >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Can I force EIGRP and OSPF to form neighbor relationship while the IP >>>> is a >>>> > primary on R1 side and secondary on R2 side, and if yes what would be >>>> the >>>> > command. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Regards, >>>> > >>>> > Amin >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________________________________ >>>> > Subscription information may be found at: >>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>>> Subscription information may be found at: >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Fri Sep 30 2011 - 22:22:38 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 01 2011 - 07:26:26 ART