One other note... even in transparent mode, if the spanning-tree root values
are more desirable, it will become root.
My SOP is to blank the switch and remove its vlan data files (reboot) and
then add it to the environment
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
robclav_at_gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 3:48 AM
To: Nick Jay; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: VTP question
Hi Nick,
The question should be who push the vtp changes?
The answer is yes, because this client with the same domain, has a higher
revision. So. When this switch send his update with higher revision for the
same domain, the rest of switches will update their vtp database as if was a
server update.
Hth,
Robclav
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry. de Vodafone
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Jay <wanttobeccde_at_yahoo.com>
Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:27:43
To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Reply-To: Nick Jay <wanttobeccde_at_yahoo.com>
Subject: VTP question
If a new switch is added in a network, With higher revision number,same
domain name but in "CLIENT" mode.. Will it harm the network by flushing the
vlan information of the existing network?
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Sep 29 2011 - 11:18:43 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 01 2011 - 07:26:26 ART