Re: ROUTER TYPE

Depending on the IOS and catalyst hardware, QoS is available. The real
measure be the hardware forwarding rate and can say with no doubt that an L3
switch will handle ethernet better than most routers (always some
exceptions...)

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:52 PM, OLUSEGUN DADA <engrenny_at_hotmail.com> wrote:

> yea, am also looking at Switching Platform, but the central location will
> be
> giving internet connectivity to four of the remote locations... so am
> looking
> at QOS AND SECURITY when needed.
>
> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:41:50 -0700
> Subject: Re: ROUTER TYPE
> From: renorider_at_gmail.com
> To: engrenny_at_hotmail.com
> CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>
> With that much ethernet, I would suggest making sure that hardware
> forwarding
> can handle your aggregate bandwidth. I would suggest a catalyst series if
> all
> ethernet handoffs.
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:30 PM, OLUSEGUN DADA <engrenny_at_hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> HELLO EVERYONE... PLEASE AM TRYING TO INTEGRATE WAN LINKS TO A CENTRAL
>
> LOCATION. SIX WAN LINKS WILL BE COMING INTO THE CENTRAL LOCATION IN FORM OF
>
> ETHERNET CONNECTIONS... I JUST WANT TO KNOW WHICH MODEL OF CISCO ROUTER
>
> SUPPORT UP TO SIX ETHERNET PORTS THAT CAN BE USE.... OR CAN I USE A 2800
>
> SERIES AND ADD ETHERNET MODULE TO IT..
>
>
>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
>
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Sep 05 2011 - 17:55:35 ART