Re: auto rp ..ttl value ?

THNAKS FOR INSPIRING ME .... MAN THIS JOURNEY IS TAING ME TO MY LIMITS

On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Joseph L. Brunner
<joe_at_affirmedsystems.com>wrote:

> Yeah- I had 20 routers, 5 switches and two terminal server 2600's with octo
> cables under my desk at my last full time job with 2 wireshark boxes for 6
> months :)
>
> All the while reading the docs cd's, and googling almost all the debug
> output :)
>
> Joe
> #19366 (up for lab this year before end of oct)
>
>
> *From*: imran ali [mailto:immrccie_at_gmail.com]
> *Sent*: Sunday, August 14, 2011 10:12 AM
> *To*: Joseph L. Brunner
> *Cc*: alexeim73_at_gmail.com <alexeim73_at_gmail.com>; Cisco certification <
> ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> *Subject*: Re: auto rp ..ttl value ?
>
> Agreed...going back to basics.... but honestly did u ever tried to go
> beyond vendor books ?
>
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Joseph L. Brunner <
> joe_at_affirmedsystems.com> wrote:
>
>> You lack clear knowledge that is in the CCIE Written study guide by
>> Wendell Odom.
>>
>> It has very specific details about what multicast message is sent to what
>> group address and packet level details.
>>
>> As a CCIE Candidate who has already passed the CCIE Written exam, you
>> should now be preparing for your lab exam on live routers, running extensive
>> debug's to create
>> a memory between what you learned in the book, the commands and the
>> results.
>>
>> This way you won't waste $3,000 in total lab fees and travel costs to sit
>> the lab to realize you should have done this more BEFORE you lab date.
>>
>> Get moving
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> imran ali
>> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 9:09 AM
>> To: alexeim73_at_gmail.com
>> Cc: Cisco certification
>> Subject: Re: auto rp ..ttl value ?
>>
>> thanks for the info
>>
>> one more quick question
>>
>> whats the TTL vlaue for join messages
>>
>> are join messages send to a reserved multicast group or are these unicast
>> messgess ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Alexei Monastyrnyi <alexeim73_at_gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Hi.
>> > RP announce and discovery are not link-local, or it would defeat the
>> > purpose I reckon.
>> >
>> > I vaguely remember from somewhere that default TTL value for them is 64
>> > (may be wrong here). You can scope rp-discovery one with ip pim
>> > send-rp-discovery scope ttl-value.
>> >
>> > You can also affect announcements propagation with boundary settings.
>> >
>> > Here is a nice link to have a read
>> >
>> >
>> http://www.netcraftsmen.net/resources/archived-articles/375-ip-multicast-and-pim-rendezvous-points.html
>> >
>> > HTH
>> > A.
>> >
>> > On 8/12/2011 10:01 PM, imran ali wrote:
>> >
>> > hi experts
>> >
>> > just a quick question
>> >
>> > whats a TTL value of auto rp groups ... 224.0.1.39 ..224.0.0.40....
>> are
>> > these groups link local ?
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Aug 14 2011 - 17:17:09 ART