Re: MA , RP , PLACEMENTS ON FRAME-RELAY

HI MARKO (SIR)

*I HAVE LABBED THIS UP AND FOUND THAT ....*
**
*MA on spoke and RP on hub ...works fine*
**
*MA behind a spoke and RP on hub....works fine*
**
*if i remove RP from hub and place it on spoke ...MA on another spoke
...nothing works out..*

*i am running sparse mode ....static rp only for auto rp groups ...and auto
rp for rest .....pim nbma on hub*

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:17 AM, imran ali <immrccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Thnaks Marko
>
> i document is a great resourse . and its says to place MA and RP on hub or
> behind a hub.
>
> The limitation is in place due to fact that NBMA mode works for sparse
> mode groups (but as auto rp groups are dense mode flooded )
>
> However my question was if i define a static rp for auto RP groups ,auto rp
> info is now sparse mode flooded ..... NBMA mode works here ....which means
> technically MA AND RP CAN BE PLACED ANY WHEARE IN THE FRAME-RELAY NETWORK ,
> REGARDLESS OF ITS POSITION ? CORRECT ?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:
>
>> That is correct, however, it doesn't mean the solution doesn't exist.
>> It may not be straight-forward, but it exists.
>>
>> Cisco has a document that explains this problem:
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/solutions_docs/ip_multicast/White_papers/frm_rlay.html#wp1029926
>>
>> However, if the CCIE lab requires you to put MA behind a spoke, there
>> is a solution - tunneling :-)
>>
>> --
>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>>
>> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 13:55, imran ali <immrccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> > If a candidate RP or a
>> >
>> > Mapping Agent is placed behind the spoke node, then RP information could
>> >
>> > be lost. Imagine if a MA is located behind the spoke node. Then any
>> Auto-RP
>> >
>> > discovery messages will only reach the hub node, but not the other
>> spokes
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > i cough up with this in one of workbooks ,,,,just want to confirm ..i
>> will
>> > update the results on this thread .
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Marko Milivojevic <
>> markom_at_ipexpert.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Before we do it - have you tried it? What problems did you run into?
>> >> How did you resolve them?
>> >>
>> >> [ btw. - YES :-) ]
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>> >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>> >>
>> >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>> >>
>> >> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
>> >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:48, imran ali <immrccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi experts
>> >> >
>> >> > i am a bit confused and tried to google but dint find any reasonable
>> >> > resource on this topic
>> >> >
>> >> > what are valid positions of MA (mapping agent ) and RP on hub and
>> spoke
>> >> > network ....
>> >> >
>> >> > please give *me yes or no* to the following questions . this is for
>> >> > auto
>> >> > rp set up and imagine , sparse mode only , and static rp is assigned
>> for
>> >> > auto rp groups , pim nbme is enabled on hub
>> >> >
>> >> > 1) can a spoke becomes a RP ?
>> >> >
>> >> > 2)can a spoke become MA ?
>> >> >
>> >> > 3) can a MA be situated behind a spoke ?
>> >> >
>> >> > 4) can an RP be situated behind a spoke ?
>> >> >
>> >> > 5) can a RP Be placed behind HUB
>> >> >
>> >> > 6)can a MA be placed behing hub ?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > if possible plz give justificatioin of yes and no .
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Aug 12 2011 - 02:54:10 ART