No, it does not imply that all traffic will traverse the root.
If your new root has only one link, no traffic will traverse it.
But it will get involved in all TCs (topology changes).
If it does have more than one link, then things get more weird,
as both links will be in your ST and at most half of your traffic
will go through it (for as long as it lives :)
-Carlos
Joe Astorino @ 01/08/2011 02:00 -0300 dixit:
> Generally it is a really bad design topology. But, the answer is it
> depends. More information on your L2 topology would make it easier to
> answer that question.
>
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 6:19 PM, emir d souza <emir979_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've got a dumb question. Say if a rogue switch (L2 switch) with a lower
>> STP
>> priority were to take over the network as the root, does this mean that all
>> network traffic will be sent to this switch before it is sent back to the
>> core switch (the only L3 switch in the network)? It's just that the CPU
>> utilization has spiked up on this rogue switch and I'm wondering if the
>> increase has anything to do with network traffic being sent to it.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Mon Aug 01 2011 - 06:52:20 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Sep 01 2011 - 06:05:56 ART