Re: OT: Different costs for OSPF connected networks through

FTR, I found no way to have 2 different costs on the same interface
"internal" to OSPF, but a route-map combined with a redistribute
connected and a pair of prefix lists did the trick.

-Carlos

marc abel @ 29/07/2011 11:53 -0300 dixit:
> If each is it's own area then it should work fine without trying to
> manipulate costs. OSPF is going to prefer intra-area routes over
> inter-area routes.
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> wrote:
>> I'm trying to make some traffic flow trhough different entry/exit points
>> in a large L2 network which has a l2l partition.
>> (I.e. two areas connected by a not so big link, namely two sites
>> and a l2l link).
>>
>> Each site has its own GW, both are providing redundant
>> support to each other. Local addressing has some superimposed L3
>> networks, some local to each site (logically speaking), some are
>> "global". They are running HSRP.
>>
>> Problem: How can I make each router advertise local and remote networks
>> with different costs so the incoming traffic is routed to the correct
>> GW ?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net