Re: Practice lab pacing

From: Jeferson Guardia <jefersonf_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:12:43 -0300

Back in my journey I've done all Narbik and INE stuff. I would have a
timeline in the board so I had to complete each technology in a due date,
this way I would be following up a study plan and attacking the game with
discipline. At the end of the program, I found Narbik's material so useful
that I went through them again but picked up only the most tricky stuff.

Example: He would have more than 10 labs for OSPF . I would do the final 2
labs , mini mock lab scenarios testing out all the small features you've
learned along the way, this way I could go back and forth without spending
much time, always on track.

Cheers,

2011/7/18 Stephen Lynch <slynch_at_absnt.com>

> Alright, so I'm working through Narbik's workbook - which is excellent btw.
> But I find myself feeling that by the time I finish the workbook, I'll
> forget the labs at the beginning. I'm curious on how everyone else paces
> themselves for practice labs?
>
> My current plan is to first complete Narbik's workbook to get me warmed up
> and then start the workbook over again, but this time adding a mock lab
> each
> week out of INE's workbook II. How does everyone else practice?
> Additionally, when you first started doing mock labs did you reference the
> answers a lot and then gradually start to remember solutions or would you
> take the mock lab - not referencing the solutions and then identify your
> weak areas that you would need to study individually?
>
> Thanks,
> Stephen Lynch
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Jeferson Guardia
CCIE #28157
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Jul 18 2011 - 19:12:43 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 01 2011 - 06:30:06 ART