Re: BGP Passing Route's w/o the Network Command

What I was referring to is PPPoFR, but you are correct and I was wrong. It
becomes a connected route and doesn't get pushed into the BGP routing table.
The nature of PPP is that it will pass along a /32 connected route through the
use of the virtual-template with the dlci applied to it.
 
Sorry for the
confusion, but it did help me clear up my misunderstanding. Thanks! ;)
 
R1(config-router)#do sh run int s0/0/0.123
Building configuration...
Current
configuration : 242 bytes
!
interface Serial0/0/0.123 multipoint
 frame-relay
map ip 10.1.1.3 103 broadcast
 frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.2 102 broadcast
 frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template123
 frame-relay
interface-dlci 103 ppp Virtual-Template123
end
!
R1(config-router)#do sh run
int virtual-template 123
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 72
bytes
!
interface Virtual-Template123
 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
end
!
R1(config-router)#do sh ip route | b C
C 1.0.0.0/8 is directly
connected, Loopback0
     10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks
C 10.1.1.2/32 is directly connected, Virtual-Access1
C 10.1.1.3/32
is directly connected, Virtual-Access3
C 10.1.1.0/24 is directly
connected, Virtual-Access1
                    is directly connected,
Virtual-Access3
!
R1(config-router)#do sh ip bgp
R1(config-router)#
!
R1(config-router)#do sh run | s bgp
router bgp 111
 no synchronization
 bgp
log-neighbor-changes
 neighbor 10.1.1.3 remote-as 113
 no auto-summary

!
R3(config-router)#do sh ip route | b C
C 3.0.0.0/8 is directly
connected, Loopback0
     10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 10.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, Virtual-Access1
C 10.1.1.1/32
is directly connected, Virtual-Access1
 
Regards,
Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP,
CCDP, MCSE
http://mycciepursuit.wordpress.com/

From: Carlos G Mendioroz
<tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
To: Jay McMickle <jay.mcmickle_at_yahoo.com>
Cc: Steven
Blasiol <steven.blasiol_at_gmail.com>; "tobibabatunde_at_gmail.com"
<tobibabatunde_at_gmail.com>; Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent:
Saturday, July 9, 2011 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: BGP Passing Route's w/o the
Network Command

Ways to get a BGP prefix:

1-network
2-redistribution
3-from
a neighbour
4-from another already known network (1,2 or 3) via
4.1-
aggregation (shorter prefixes to known networks)
4.2- injection (longer
prefixes to known networks)

How is that you can get a ppp /32 into BGP ?
-Carlos

Jay McMickle @ 09/07/2011 08:54 -0300 dixit:
> The only way I can
see that it would pass routes would be with PPP. you would get a /32 in the
BGP table. Other than that- anyone else have an idea?
>
> Can you present a
snipit of such a config and their routing tables. Love to see that one.
>
>
Regards,
> Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP
> Sent from my iPhone
>
http://mycciepursuit.wordpress.com
>
>
> On Jul 8, 2011, at 2:53 PM, Steven
Blasiol <steven.blasiol_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Not between the routers. They
are directly connected.
>> On Jul 8, 2011 3:42 PM, <tobibabatunde_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> Do you have an underlying IGP running?
>>> Sent from my BlackBerry.
wireless handheld from Glo Mobile.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>
From: Steven Blasiol <steven.blasiol_at_gmail.com>
>>> Sender:
nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>>> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:25:35
>>> To: Cisco
certification<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>>> Reply-To: Steven Blasiol
<steven.blasiol_at_gmail.com>
>>> Subject: BGP Passing Route's w/o the Network
Command
>>>
>>> Can someone tell me a mechanism by which two eBGP peers would
pass routes
>>> without having network statements for those routes? No
redistribution...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steven M. Blasiol
>>>
>>>
--Confidence is stain they can't wipe off...-Lil Wayne
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and
organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>>
Received on Sun Jul 10 2011 - 20:22:46 ART