Re: BGP Passing Route's w/o the Network Command

The only way I can see that it would pass routes would be with PPP. you would get a /32 in the BGP table. Other than that- anyone else have an idea?

Can you present a snipit of such a config and their routing tables. Love to see that one.

Regards,
Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP
Sent from my iPhone
http://mycciepursuit.wordpress.com

On Jul 8, 2011, at 2:53 PM, Steven Blasiol <steven.blasiol_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Not between the routers. They are directly connected.
> On Jul 8, 2011 3:42 PM, <tobibabatunde_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Do you have an underlying IGP running?
>> Sent from my BlackBerry. wireless handheld from Glo Mobile.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Steven Blasiol <steven.blasiol_at_gmail.com>
>> Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:25:35
>> To: Cisco certification<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> Reply-To: Steven Blasiol <steven.blasiol_at_gmail.com>
>> Subject: BGP Passing Route's w/o the Network Command
>>
>> Can someone tell me a mechanism by which two eBGP peers would pass routes
>> without having network statements for those routes? No redistribution...
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Steven M. Blasiol
>>
>> --Confidence is stain they can't wipe off...-Lil Wayne
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jul 09 2011 - 06:54:18 ART