RE: BGP Passing Route's w/o the Network Command

I was thinking that an aggregate-address could be configured, but that alone
didn't do it when the route was connected. Adding redistribute connected of
course corrected that. Don't know if this is possible without redistributing
connected.

David

--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Steven Blasiol
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 3:53 PM
> To: tobibabatunde_at_gmail.com; Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: BGP Passing Route's w/o the Network Command
> 
> Not between the routers.  They are directly connected.
> On Jul 8, 2011 3:42 PM, <tobibabatunde_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Do you have an underlying IGP running?
> > Sent from my BlackBerry. wireless handheld from Glo Mobile.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steven Blasiol <steven.blasiol_at_gmail.com>
> > Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> > Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:25:35
> > To: Cisco certification<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> > Reply-To: Steven Blasiol <steven.blasiol_at_gmail.com>
> > Subject: BGP Passing Route's w/o the Network Command
> >
> > Can someone tell me a mechanism by which two eBGP peers would pass
> routes
> > without having network statements for those routes?  No
> redistribution...
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Steven M. Blasiol
> >
> > --Confidence is stain they can't wipe off...-Lil Wayne
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net