Hi Abdullah,
This is required to redistribute other connected routes via BGP. I did try
to remove redistribute connected under BGP vrf VPN_A and left only network
statement for loopbacks, but no luck. I beleive, logically, I don't even
need network statement under bgp vrf process as loopback should be
advertised via redistribute connected command.
Thanks,
Bilal Hansrod
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Abdullah Al-Malki
<a.almalki1402_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> I think you do not need the "redistribute connected under bgp IP address
> family of vrf A"
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:
>
>> 2a. Make sure newly created Loopbacks are reachable through MPLS
>> backbone and not through OSPF.
>>
>> --
>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>>
>> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 04:53, Bilal Hansrod <bilal.hansrod_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I am labbing up a sham-link to prefer MPLS path over backdoor OSPF
>> route.
>> > The lab set-up is simple as below:
>> >
>> > R5 -> R4 (RR) -> R6
>> >
>> > I am creating a sham-link from R5 to R6, so I followed the below steps:
>> >
>> > 1. Create loopback 200 on both routers and assign to vrf
>> >
>> > B B R5
>> >
>> > B B interface Loopback200
>> > B B ip vrf forwarding VPN_A
>> > B B ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
>> >
>> > B B R6
>> >
>> > B B interface Loopback200
>> > B B ip vrf forwarding VPN_A
>> > B B ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > 2. Advertise /32 loopback other than OSPF, so advertised via BGP
>> >
>> > B B R5
>> >
>> > B B router bgp 100
>> > B B address-family ipv4 vrf VPN_A
>> > B B network 1.1.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255
>> >
>> >
>> > B B R6
>> >
>> > B B router bgp 100
>> > B B address-family ipv4 vrf VPN_A
>> > B B network 2.2.2.2 mask 255.255.255.255
>> >
>> >
>> > 3. create sham-link
>> >
>> > B B R5
>> >
>> > B B router ospf 10 vrf VPN_A
>> > B B area 1 sham-link 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 cost 1
>> >
>> > B B R6
>> >
>> > B B router ospf 10 vrf VPN_A
>> > B B area 1 sham-link 2.2.2.2 1.1.1.1 cost 1
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Once I enabled sham-link command, the link starts to flaps. The OSPF_SL
>> > interface comes up and than within seconds it shows Interface down or
>> > detached. Please see full configuration as below with error messages
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > R5
>> >
>> > interface Loopback200
>> > B ip vrf forwarding VPN_A
>> > B ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
>>
>> >
>> > router ospf 10 vrf VPN_A
>> > B log-adjacency-changes
>> > B redistribute bgp 100 subnets tag 667
>> > B network 155.1.58.5 0.0.0.0 area 1
>> > B area 1 sham-link 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 cost 1
>> >
>> > router ospf 1
>> > B log-adjacency-changes
>> > B network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
>> >
>> >
>> > router bgp 100
>> > B no bgp default ipv4-unicast
>> > B bgp log-neighbor-changes
>> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 remote-as 100
>> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 update-source Loopback0
>> > B !
>> > B address-family vpnv4
>> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 activate
>> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 send-community extended
>> > B exit-address-family
>> >
>> > B address-family ipv4 vrf VPN_A
>> > B redistribute connected
>> > B redistribute static
>> > B redistribute ospf 10 vrf VPN_A
>> > B no synchronization
>> > B network 1.1.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255
>> > B exit-address-family
>> >
>> >
>> > R6
>> >
>> > interface Loopback200
>> > B ip vrf forwarding VPN_A
>> > B ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255
>>
>> >
>> > router ospf 10 vrf VPN_A
>> > B log-adjacency-changes
>> > B summary-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0
>> > B redistribute bgp 100 subnets tag 666
>> > B network 155.1.67.6 0.0.0.0 area 1
>>
>> > area 1 sham-link 2.2.2.2 1.1.1.1 cost 1
>> >
>> > router ospf 1
>> > B log-adjacency-changes
>> > B network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
>> >
>> > router bgp 100
>> > B no bgp default ipv4-unicast
>> > B bgp log-neighbor-changes
>> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 remote-as 100
>> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 update-source Loopback0
>> > B !
>> > B address-family vpnv4
>> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 activate
>> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 send-community extended
>> > B exit-address-family
>> >
>> >
>> > B address-family ipv4 vrf VPN_A
>> > B redistribute connected
>> > B redistribute static
>> > B redistribute ospf 10 vrf VPN_A
>> > B no synchronization
>> > B network 2.2.2.2 mask 255.255.255.255
>> > B exit-address-family
>> >
>> > Mar B 1 00:56:20.951: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 10, Nbr 172.16.5.5 on
>> OSPF_SL0
>>
>> > from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
>> > *Mar B 1 00:56:22.103: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 10, Nbr 172.16.5.5 on
>> OSPF_SL0
>>
>> > from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Interface down or detached
>> > *Mar B 1 00:56:40.835: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 10, Nbr 172.16.5.5 on
>> OSPF_SL0
>>
>> > from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
>> > *Mar B 1 00:56:42.099: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 10, Nbr 172.16.5.5 on
>> OSPF_SL0
>>
>> > from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Interface down or detached
>> > *Mar B 1 00:57:01.427: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 10, Nbr 172.16.5.5 on
>> OSPF_SL0
>>
>> > from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
>> > *Mar B 1 00:57:02.103: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 10, Nbr 172.16.5.5 on
>> OSPF_SL0
>>
>> > from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Interface down or detached
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jul 02 2011 - 09:54:03 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 01 2011 - 06:30:05 ART