Re: OSPF_SL0 from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Interface down

I think you do not need the "redistribute connected under bgp IP address
family of vrf A"

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:

> 2a. Make sure newly created Loopbacks are reachable through MPLS
> backbone and not through OSPF.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 04:53, Bilal Hansrod <bilal.hansrod_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am labbing up a sham-link to prefer MPLS path over backdoor OSPF route.
> > The lab set-up is simple as below:
> >
> > R5 -> R4 (RR) -> R6
> >
> > I am creating a sham-link from R5 to R6, so I followed the below steps:
> >
> > 1. Create loopback 200 on both routers and assign to vrf
> >
> > B B R5
> >
> > B B interface Loopback200
> > B B ip vrf forwarding VPN_A
> > B B ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
> >
> > B B R6
> >
> > B B interface Loopback200
> > B B ip vrf forwarding VPN_A
> > B B ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255
> >
> >
> > 2. Advertise /32 loopback other than OSPF, so advertised via BGP
> >
> > B B R5
> >
> > B B router bgp 100
> > B B address-family ipv4 vrf VPN_A
> > B B network 1.1.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255
> >
> >
> > B B R6
> >
> > B B router bgp 100
> > B B address-family ipv4 vrf VPN_A
> > B B network 2.2.2.2 mask 255.255.255.255
> >
> >
> > 3. create sham-link
> >
> > B B R5
> >
> > B B router ospf 10 vrf VPN_A
> > B B area 1 sham-link 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 cost 1
> >
> > B B R6
> >
> > B B router ospf 10 vrf VPN_A
> > B B area 1 sham-link 2.2.2.2 1.1.1.1 cost 1
> >
> >
> > Once I enabled sham-link command, the link starts to flaps. The OSPF_SL
> > interface comes up and than within seconds it shows Interface down or
> > detached. Please see full configuration as below with error messages
> >
> >
> >
> > R5
> >
> > interface Loopback200
> > B ip vrf forwarding VPN_A
> > B ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
> >
> > router ospf 10 vrf VPN_A
> > B log-adjacency-changes
> > B redistribute bgp 100 subnets tag 667
> > B network 155.1.58.5 0.0.0.0 area 1
> > B area 1 sham-link 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 cost 1
> >
> > router ospf 1
> > B log-adjacency-changes
> > B network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
> >
> >
> > router bgp 100
> > B no bgp default ipv4-unicast
> > B bgp log-neighbor-changes
> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 remote-as 100
> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 update-source Loopback0
> > B !
> > B address-family vpnv4
> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 activate
> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 send-community extended
> > B exit-address-family
> >
> > B address-family ipv4 vrf VPN_A
> > B redistribute connected
> > B redistribute static
> > B redistribute ospf 10 vrf VPN_A
> > B no synchronization
> > B network 1.1.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255
> > B exit-address-family
> >
> >
> > R6
> >
> > interface Loopback200
> > B ip vrf forwarding VPN_A
> > B ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255
> >
> > router ospf 10 vrf VPN_A
> > B log-adjacency-changes
> > B summary-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0
> > B redistribute bgp 100 subnets tag 666
> > B network 155.1.67.6 0.0.0.0 area 1
> > area 1 sham-link 2.2.2.2 1.1.1.1 cost 1
> >
> > router ospf 1
> > B log-adjacency-changes
> > B network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
> >
> > router bgp 100
> > B no bgp default ipv4-unicast
> > B bgp log-neighbor-changes
> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 remote-as 100
> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 update-source Loopback0
> > B !
> > B address-family vpnv4
> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 activate
> > B neighbor 150.1.4.4 send-community extended
> > B exit-address-family
> >
> >
> > B address-family ipv4 vrf VPN_A
> > B redistribute connected
> > B redistribute static
> > B redistribute ospf 10 vrf VPN_A
> > B no synchronization
> > B network 2.2.2.2 mask 255.255.255.255
> > B exit-address-family
> >
> > Mar B 1 00:56:20.951: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 10, Nbr 172.16.5.5 on
> OSPF_SL0
> > from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
> > *Mar B 1 00:56:22.103: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 10, Nbr 172.16.5.5 on
> OSPF_SL0
> > from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Interface down or detached
> > *Mar B 1 00:56:40.835: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 10, Nbr 172.16.5.5 on
> OSPF_SL0
> > from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
> > *Mar B 1 00:56:42.099: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 10, Nbr 172.16.5.5 on
> OSPF_SL0
> > from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Interface down or detached
> > *Mar B 1 00:57:01.427: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 10, Nbr 172.16.5.5 on
> OSPF_SL0
> > from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
> > *Mar B 1 00:57:02.103: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 10, Nbr 172.16.5.5 on
> OSPF_SL0
> > from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Interface down or detached
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jul 01 2011 - 18:32:43 ART