Re: MPLS VPN doubt

I can not imagine a need to do so. I've never seen a way to do so either.
(Note that he was not implying that *the same network* gets
different RDs, just the same VRF)

On the other hand, the show command displays "RD xx default for VRF yy",
and that makes me believe that someone did think about being able to
change that, something like a route-map set action.

Would you please quote the paragraph that says so ?

-Carlos

Raghava Rao @ 30/06/2011 06:32 -0300 dixit:
> No, AFAIK..
>
> RD as you know distinguishes the same set of routes between two vrf's
>
> And why will you reuse the same IP address's in your vrf's again and
> distinguish it?? inside your own vrf's?
>
> You will never use the same ip addresses in your network, right?? then why
> do you need different RD inside the vrf?
>
> HTH
>
> Raghava Rao
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:37 PM, HEMANTH RAJ <hemanthrj_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi fellows
>> I have a doubt regarding MPLS L3 VPN, Can we use two different RD's in the
>> same VRF. Is it possible. In MPLS Fundamentals, I came across a sentence
>> which says that two different RD's are possible for the same VRF.
>> Can anyone shed some light on it.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Problems arise because we talk,problems are not solved because we don't
>> talk
>> So good or bad talk to your affectionate one's freely.
>>
>> Yours Friendly,
>> H P HEMANTH RAJ
>> CCIE#28593 (R&S)
>> Cisco Systems
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net