Re: community VRF scenario

Bingo!

Thank you Fabian, it worked like a charm. Is this usally overlooked or is it
just me stupid? I thought I would just need it in the PE where I am mixing
the VRFs...

Regards

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Fabian Pucciarelli <fabiangp_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Are you setting the rt in all the PEs or just one? You may need the export
> map and the keyword additive configured in all the devices exporting routes.
> On Jun 17, 2011 12:03 PM, "Persio Pucci" <persio_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Some more data here...
> >
> > I see it working (I see routes from one VRF into the other) but the thing
> is
> > I only see SOME routes.
> >
> > This is the original VRF's ip route table (names and addresses have been
> > changed to protect the innocent)
> >
> > 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
> >> C 10.23.129.184/30 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0.72
> >> L 10.23.129.185/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0.72
> >> 17.62.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
> >> B 17.62.105.0 [20/0] via 10.23.129.186, 03:05:17
> >> B 17.62.106.0 [20/0] via 10.23.129.186, 03:05:17
> >> 172.17.0.0/28 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> >> B 172.17.0.32 [200/0] via 20.15.231.1, 03:05:17
> >> 20.62.53.0/32 is subnetted, 2 subnets
> >> B 20.62.53.61 [200/0] via 20.15.231.1, 03:05:17
> >> B 20.62.53.62 [200/0] via 20.15.231.1, 03:05:17
> >
> >
> > This is the destination VRF that was supposed to receive ALL routes:
> >
> > 17.62.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
> >> B 17.62.105.0 [20/0] via 10.23.129.186 (VRF_A), 03:07:11
> >> B 17.62.106.0 [20/0] via 10.23.129.186 (VRF_A), 03:07:11
> >
> >
> > I am using a export map route-map matching all the subnets (there are
> hits
> > to all of them) and setting the extcomm to a new RT that is being both
> > exported at the source VRF and imported at the destination VRF, as we can
> > see here:
> >
> > sh ip bgp vpnv4 vrf VRF_B 17.62.105.0
> >> BGP routing table entry for 1234:5555:17.62.105.0/24, version 534
> >> Paths: (1 available, best #1, table VRF_B)
> >> Not advertised to any peer
> >> 5555, imported path from 1234:4444:17.62.105.0/24
> >> 10.23.129.186 (via VRF_A) from 10.23.129.186 (10.23.128.14)
> >> Origin incomplete, localpref 100, valid, external, best
> >> Extended Community: RT:1234:4444 RT:1234:5555
> >
> >
> > Why are the others not being inserted as well? I receive both 17. subnets
> > from one BGP peer on this router, while the others I receive from a
> > different peer... nevermind the connected ones
> >
> > Persio
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Persio Pucci <persio_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> looking for some help creating a community VRF scenario where multiple
> VRFs
> >> will need to communicate to one common VRF. This common VRF will need to
> >> learn the routes from all the others VRF. In the other hand, I'll have
> to
> >> selectively export routes from the community VRF to each of the other
> VRFs.
> >>
> >> I've been working some with import/export maps to no avail. Anybody
> there
> >> too bored to help? :)
> >>
> >> Persio
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jun 17 2011 - 15:16:41 ART