Re: OT`: 3750v2 stack

Configure the manual priorities .

"switch <> priority <> " ..... 15 being the max priority .... max means
master ..

Also ; to tell you .. the switch that comes up first will become master ..
so first bring the master up .. then slave ...

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Maarten Vervoorn <mr.vervoorn_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Yes, they are running the exact same IOS version and feature set except
> that
> one is for the previous two 3750 and the other one for version 2
>
>
>
>
> 2011/6/10 Chris Proctor <chris_at_cwproctor.net>
>
> > Are they running the same code level and feature set?
> >
> > There is a priority for mastership that is based on those factors. Can't
> > recall if it overrides the manual priority.
> >
> >
> > On 6/10/2011 2:34 PM, Maarten Vervoorn wrote:
> >
> >> Hi group,
> >>
> >> Does anyone have any experience with issue stacking a cisco the 3750v2
> and
> >> normal 3750 switch. I have a stack of 3 switches. The v2 switch
> configured
> >> with the lowest priority so it should be switch 3 in the stack but it
> >> comes
> >> in the stack as switch 2 and the other switch is disapeared from the
> stack
> >>
> >> thanks in advance
> >>
> >> Maarten
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
> >> Click here to report this message as spam.
> >>
> https://mail-relay.cwproctor.net/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=BB91727E7F.A643E
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Chris Proctor
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jun 11 2011 - 00:22:38 ART