Re: Many Input Errors F0/0 without CRC

From: Shaughn <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:46:39 +0200

Hard code your interface speed/duplex. Then clear the counters and see what happens

CCIE # 23962 (SP)

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 6, 2011, at 8:45 PM, Kaio Vilar <kaiovilar_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> GigabitEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
>
> 30 second output rate 594000 bits/sec, 247 packets/sec
>
> 284744712 packets input, 3822768605 bytes, 0 no buffer
>
> Received 4 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 75 throttles
>
> 1971 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 1971 ignored
>
> 0 watchdog, 0 multicast, 323559 pause input
>
> 0 input packets with dribble condition detected
>
>
> 2011/6/6 Haroon <itguy.pro_at_gmail.com>
>
>> Jeferson,
>>
>> Why wouldn't you peer with ISP using ethernet? We've doine that in our data
>> center and haven't had any issues.... please let me know if I've missed
>> something?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Haroon
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Jeferson Guardia <jefersonf_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Sh int XXX counters err
>>>
>>> Dont let it auto negotiate, make sure You manually set speed with the
>>> provider.
>>>
>>> Make sure that broadcast you are using is private , for you and the
>>> provider. In case you are sharing that segment with others, collisions might
>>> happen thus you'll likely end up retransmitting it but not because of a l1
>>> issue but the way the segment is saturated.. Btw, I wouldn't peer with an
>>> ISP using Ethernet, only on some DC scenarios.
>>>
>>> Best luck
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/06/2011, at 15:17, Christian Hunter <stasis416_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Post a sh int fa0/0
>>>>
>>>> Different errors mean different things.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Kaio Vilar <kaiovilar_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi masters,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm having a little problem, I have a link of 10Mbps in a 2800 router,
>>> the
>>>>> interface f0 / 0 is generating many "Input Errors" but no CRC. My ISP
>>> has
>>>>> checked the circuit and found no problem. I'm thinking maybe the
>>> interface
>>>>> buffer problem, what do you think? have any command that I can verify
>>> this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Kaio Vilar
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Jun 06 2011 - 20:46:39 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 01 2011 - 06:24:27 ART