RE: IBGP Vs. EBGP

Dear Joe,
can you clarify more what you mean by (needing next hop reserved for this service)?i can understand that by using IBGP next hop in our network will not be changed but if it's about that we can make a route map outbound to their direction to set it with next hop value they need?
About route reflector client ... my problem here is that i have a small device for IGW using Default Route outside my AS,by changing it from that to a Route Reflector carrying Full internet Table would sure Affect my Process Cpu on that IGW.
clarify more your points and i appreciate ur help.

> From: joe_at_affirmedsystems.com
> To: tetoo_me_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: IBGP Vs. EBGP
> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:43:40 +0000
>
> They probably want next hop preserved for this type of device so they can get that from ibgp. Ebgp of course does full tables and communities can be sent no problem.
>
> You got to remember, the smartest engineers don't work at these vendors in the "customer facing role" and they probably have their script they learned in 2 weeks of training - you are messing with them when you ask for deviations of that script!
>
> Don't worry too much about introducing a route reflector client in your network - simply make them use the community "no advertise" upon receipt if possible so they can't do anything with the routes.
>
> -Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Mohamed Osama
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 8:52 AM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: IBGP Vs. EBGP
>
> Dear All,
> I Hope if someone can advice me about this Issue,
> In our AS there is a New test device thats works as J-Flow (some sort of Netflow caching) is being insterted into out Network,
> They Want to Peering with our Internet Gateway Router as IBGP,
> however our Rules is to not Config any IBGP peering with a box that is not fully controlled and managed by our side.
> We said that we want to config peering as EBGP,however they claim that EBGP peering didn't give them required information as Full internet Routing Table and Full Community Issues and they Want it IBGP.
> Anyone can advice me about this Issue,if i can Config It as EBGP but find a way to let Test Box feel like IBGP.
> Or Develop a Policy for IBGP Peering,however that will make me to config IGW as Route Reflector and Will Impact Our Process from Changing it as Router Contains only a Default Route to a RR peer IBGP with Test Box.
> Thanks,Osama
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jun 03 2011 - 18:25:06 ART