Carlos,
It could be interesting to compare this behavior to the way other protocol
treat 3rd party next-hops. Also, try figuring the process that OSPF uses
when picking up an FA for NSSA prefixes. A while ago I wrote a few summaries
on the 3rd party NHops processing in different routing protocols, hope it
might be helpful still:
http://blog.ine.com/2010/09/02/understanding-third-party-next-hop/
http://blog.ine.com/2009/11/13/ospf-prefix-filtering-using-forwarding-address/
Look into that NSSA FA selection process, it might be amusing :)
Regards,
-- Petr Lapukhov, petr_at_INE.com CCIE #16379 (R&S/Security/SP/Voice) CCDE #20100007 Internetwork Expert, Inc. http://www.INE.com Toll Free: 877-224-8987 Outside US: 775-826-4344 2011/5/31 Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> > Just wanted to share a small quiz. Try to answer w/o labbing this up. > > Topology: Central site with a firewall connected by a lan to two borders > (B1 and B2) using HSRP for DG (FHRP). Borders run serial links to > branches. OSPF single area in the WAN. > > B1 and B2 have a static route to an internal network X poining to the > FW. B1 redidtributes X with metric 20 metric type 1. B2 does the same > thing with metric 50. > > At a branch,, how many routes do you see, assuming same bandwidth on > both serial links ? > > -- > Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Tue May 31 2011 - 14:50:01 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 01 2011 - 09:01:12 ART