I am sorry but are you trying to connect the two IPv6 networks through IPv4?
If so what solution are you using? P2P or Multipoint solution?
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Bryan Stair <uptown.ccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> OSPF....I set it up exactly the way Marko posted it. OSPF core dual stack
> at
> the edge running 6PE. My home lab was already up so I used frame at the
> edge
> and ethernet in the core. I can see the routes in the table, but ping won't
> work. The documentation said IPv6 ICMP control message will not work. My
> question simply is do I need to setup any type of tunnel to get it working.
>
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What r u using for the core IGP?
> >
> > Paul
> > --
> > Paul Negron
> > CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752
> > Senior Technical Instructor
> > www.micronicstraining.com
> >
> >
> >
> > > From: Bryan Stair <uptown.ccie_at_gmail.com>
> > > Reply-To: Bryan Stair <uptown.ccie_at_gmail.com>
> > > Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 09:12:55 -0400
> > > To: <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> > > Subject: Fwd: IPv6 Dual Stacking question
> > >
> > > question never made it to the list
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: Bryan Stair <uptown.ccie_at_gmail.com>
> > > Date: Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:57 AM
> > > Subject: Re: IPv6 Dual Stacking question
> > > To: Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
> > > Cc: Juan <fferrer10_at_gmail.com>, "ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" <
> > > ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> > >
> > >
> > > Marko,
> > >
> > > I have one question please forgive me if I seem like a novice. I read
> up
> > on
> > > the technology which I believe is 6PE, second I followed your setup
> > scenario
> > > posted on your blog. However I was not allowed to ping from IPv6 CE to
> CE
> > of
> > > course it worked from PE to CE. In reading the Cisco docs one caveat
> was
> > > IPv6 ICMP control message will not be passed at the edge. Is this the
> > case
> > > or have I missed something? One thing I failed to mentioned was I set
> > this
> > > up over Frame just to see what would happen.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Marko Milivojevic <
> markom_at_ipexpert.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> You've seen the configuration :-). Other than LSPs, are there any
> > tunnels
> > >> configured? :-)
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> > >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> > >>
> > >> Free CCIE Training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
> > >>
> > >> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> > >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> > >> Community: http://www.ipexpert.com/communities
> > >>
> > >> :: Sent from my phone. Apologies for errors and brevity. ::
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Apr 27, 2011, at 1:11, Juan <fferrer10_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Many thanks Marko...
> > >>>
> > >>> Anyway, i have some doubts... If you configure dual stacking at the
> CEs
> > >> you
> > >> have on the ends of the ipv4....do you need to have a tunnel between
> the
> > >> PEs
> > >> to permit the ipv6 prefixes to pass the ipv4 core?
> > >>>
> > >>> Best Regards
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> 2011/4/26 Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
> > >>> You can use the same session with multiple address families - "ipv4
> > >>> unicast" and "ipv6 unicast". Just to give you an example of this, you
> > >>> can read the short blog I wrote on the subject couple of years ago:
> > >>>
> > >>> http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/06/09/ipv6-in-carrier-networks/
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> > >>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> > >>>
> > >>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
> > >>>
> > >>> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> > >>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> > >>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> > >>>
> > >>> Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this message are mine and my only
> > >>> and not the official or unofficial opinion of, or affiliated with
> > >>> IPexpert and its owners in any way.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:34, <fferrer10_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> Hi guys,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Can you provide some help about how to pass with the same bgp
> session
> > >> IPv4
> > >> &
> > >>>> IPv6 prefixes through an IPv4 Mpls network? I read something about
> the
> > >> ipv6
> > >>>> dual stacking capability of Cisco routers, but i am not sure if you
> > can
> > >> have a
> > >>>> bgp session passing the 2 types of prefixes at the same time
> (suppose
> > >> we
> > >> need
> > >>>> to comunicate 2 mixed environments, with ipv4 & ipv6 hosts at both
> > >> ends)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> TIA and best regards.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > >>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> > >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Juan Faure
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >>
> > >>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > >> Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- *Narbik Kocharians *CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) www.MicronicsTraining.com <http://www.micronicstraining.com/> Sr. Technical Instructor *Ask about our FREE Lab Voucher with our Boot Camps* YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits! Training & Remote Racks available Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sat May 07 2011 - 16:36:38 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 01 2011 - 09:01:11 ART