It worked for me when I tested.
Did you have MPLS running in the core properly?
-- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 06:58, Bryan Stair <uptown.ccie_at_gmail.com> wrote: > Marko, > > One other thing....the routes between the CE's are in each other's BGP > tables, just no pinging > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Bryan Stair <uptown.ccie_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Marko, >> >> I have one question please forgive me if I seem like a novice. I read up >> on the technology which I believe is 6PE, second I followed your setup >> scenario posted on your blog. However I was not allowed to ping from IPv6 CE >> to CE of course it worked from PE to CE.B In reading the Cisco docs one >> caveat was IPv6 ICMP control message will not be passed at the edge. Is this >> the case or have I missed something?B One thing I failed to mentioned was I >> set this up over Frame just to see what would happen. >> >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> You've seen the configuration :-). Other than LSPs, are there any tunnels >>> configured? :-) >>> >>> -- >>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert >>> >>> Free CCIE Training: http://bit.ly/vLecture >>> >>> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com >>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >>> Community: http://www.ipexpert.com/communities >>> >>> :: Sent from my phone. Apologies for errors and brevity. :: >>> >>> >>> On Apr 27, 2011, at 1:11, Juan <fferrer10_at_gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Many thanks Marko... >>> > >>> > Anyway, i have some doubts... If you configure dual stacking at the CEs >>> > you >>> have on the ends of the ipv4....do you need to have a tunnel between the >>> PEs >>> to permit the ipv6 prefixes to pass the ipv4 core? >>> > >>> > Best Regards >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > 2011/4/26 Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> >>> > You can use the same session with multiple address families - "ipv4 >>> > unicast" and "ipv6 unicast". Just to give you an example of this, you >>> > can read the short blog I wrote on the subject couple of years ago: >>> > >>> > http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/06/09/ipv6-in-carrier-networks/ >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >>> > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert >>> > >>> > FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture >>> > >>> > Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com >>> > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >>> > Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ >>> > >>> > Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this message are mine and my only >>> > and not the official or unofficial opinion of, or affiliated with >>> > IPexpert and its owners in any way. >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:34, B <fferrer10_at_gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > Hi guys, >>> > > >>> > > Can you provide some help about how to pass with the same bgp session >>> > > IPv4 >>> & >>> > > IPv6 prefixes through an IPv4 Mpls network? I read something about >>> > > the >>> ipv6 >>> > > dual stacking capability of Cisco routers, but i am not sure if you >>> > > can >>> have a >>> > > bgp session passing the 2 types of prefixes at the same time (suppose >>> > > we >>> need >>> > > to comunicate 2 B mixed environments, with ipv4 & ipv6 hosts at both >>> > > ends) >>> > > >>> > > TIA and best regards. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________________________________ >>> > > Subscription information may be found at: >>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Juan Faure >>> >>> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>> >>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>> Subscription information may be found at: >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sat May 07 2011 - 10:20:09 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 01 2011 - 09:01:11 ART