Fwd: IPv6 Dual Stacking question

From: Bryan Stair <uptown.ccie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 09:12:55 -0400

question never made it to the list

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bryan Stair <uptown.ccie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: IPv6 Dual Stacking question
To: Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
Cc: Juan <fferrer10_at_gmail.com>, "ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" <
ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>

Marko,

I have one question please forgive me if I seem like a novice. I read up on
the technology which I believe is 6PE, second I followed your setup scenario
posted on your blog. However I was not allowed to ping from IPv6 CE to CE of
course it worked from PE to CE. In reading the Cisco docs one caveat was
IPv6 ICMP control message will not be passed at the edge. Is this the case
or have I missed something? One thing I failed to mentioned was I set this
up over Frame just to see what would happen.

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:

> You've seen the configuration :-). Other than LSPs, are there any tunnels
> configured? :-)
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> Free CCIE Training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Community: http://www.ipexpert.com/communities
>
> :: Sent from my phone. Apologies for errors and brevity. ::
>
>
> On Apr 27, 2011, at 1:11, Juan <fferrer10_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Many thanks Marko...
> >
> > Anyway, i have some doubts... If you configure dual stacking at the CEs
> you
> have on the ends of the ipv4....do you need to have a tunnel between the
> PEs
> to permit the ipv6 prefixes to pass the ipv4 core?
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2011/4/26 Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
> > You can use the same session with multiple address families - "ipv4
> > unicast" and "ipv6 unicast". Just to give you an example of this, you
> > can read the short blog I wrote on the subject couple of years ago:
> >
> > http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/06/09/ipv6-in-carrier-networks/
> >
> >
> > --
> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >
> > FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
> >
> > Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> > Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> >
> > Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this message are mine and my only
> > and not the official or unofficial opinion of, or affiliated with
> > IPexpert and its owners in any way.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:34, <fferrer10_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > Can you provide some help about how to pass with the same bgp session
> IPv4
> &
> > > IPv6 prefixes through an IPv4 Mpls network? I read something about the
> ipv6
> > > dual stacking capability of Cisco routers, but i am not sure if you can
> have a
> > > bgp session passing the 2 types of prefixes at the same time (suppose
> we
> need
> > > to comunicate 2 mixed environments, with ipv4 & ipv6 hosts at both
> ends)
> > >
> > > TIA and best regards.
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Juan Faure
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat May 07 2011 - 09:12:55 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 01 2011 - 09:01:11 ART