Re: Static Routes with interface or not

From: Steve Di Bias <sdibias_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 12:37:41 -0700

I know you are using VRF's here, but this doc should help in regards to your
question.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a00800ef7b2.shtml

<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a00800ef7b2.shtml>
HTH

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Andrew LaPorte <andy_at_cloud9.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm hoping that someone can help me understand the difference between the
> following:
>
> ip route vrf VPN_A 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 GigabitEthernet0/0 1.1.1.1
>
> and
>
> ip route vrf VPN_A 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 1.1.1.1
>
> I've tried looking at the MPLS doc section for static routing but it just
> made my head spin.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
-Steve Di Bias
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu May 05 2011 - 12:37:41 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 01 2011 - 09:01:11 ART