Re: Newbe question - Relevance of OSPF

Nope.

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Jonathan Smitthers <
jsmitthers2011_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> My first post to the list and I screw it up!!!
>
> Yes I wanted to asked about the process ID, not router ID. See what
> happens when I don't have my coffee.
>
> /facepalm
>
> Do the process IDs need to be the same on an MPLS link?
>
> Thanks for the replies,
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Michael Kiefer <mjkiefer_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Jonathan,
>>
>> It's never acceptable to have duplicate router-ids. It leads to database
>> problems, flood wars, and other nastiness. Process ids on the hand are
>> always locally significant.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Jonathan Smitthers <
>> jsmitthers2011_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am a new member so please excuse the question if it is too easy or
>>> already
>>> been answered 100's of times.
>>>
>>> Normally the OSPF router id is only locally significant. But I seem to
>>> recall reading that the router ID's must match through an MPLS
>>> connection.
>>> Why? That makes no sense at all! Is the router ID transmitted through
>>> MPLS?
>>>
>>> I appreciate the help and look forward to studying with all of you.
>>> Today
>>> is day 1 of a long journey!
>>>
>>> Jonathan Smitthers
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue May 03 2011 - 10:41:56 ART