I don't follow every topic on GS in detail, but as I said - I haven't
tested this.
Do you have a link to a document where this is detailed?
-- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 16:32, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> wrote: > AFAIK, it's been documented that it works as Brian says, i.e., 5:2 relation, > or even 7:3 if need be. > This same topic has been here some 2 or 3 months ago ? > -Carlos > > Marko Milivojevic @ 02/05/2011 20:06 -0300 dixit: >> >> To make my argument further: >> >> R2#sh ip cef 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 detail >> 0.0.0.0/0, epoch 0, per-destination sharing >> B DefNet source: 0.0.0.0/0 >> B recursive via 169.254.1.1 >> B B recursive via 10.0.0.1 >> B B B attached to GigabitEthernet0/0 >> B recursive via 169.254.1.2 >> B B recursive via 10.0.0.1 >> B B B attached to GigabitEthernet0/0 >> B recursive via 169.254.1.3 >> B B recursive via 10.0.0.1 >> B B B attached to GigabitEthernet0/0 >> B recursive via 169.254.1.4 >> B B recursive via 10.0.0.1 >> B B B attached to GigabitEthernet0/0 >> B recursive via 169.254.1.5 >> B B recursive via 10.0.0.1 >> B B B attached to GigabitEthernet0/0 >> B recursive via 169.254.2.1 >> B B recursive via 20.0.0.2 >> B B B attached to GigabitEthernet0/1 >> B recursive via 169.254.2.2 >> B B recursive via 20.0.0.2 >> B B B attached to GigabitEthernet0/1 >> >> As you can see, CEF resolves this in the manner I described. >> >> -- >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert >> >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture >> >> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ >> >> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 15:55, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 15:52, Brian McGahan <bmcgahan_at_ine.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes each route is equal, but more point to one exit point vs. another. >>>> Try it, it works. >>> >>> Just to make it clear - I'm not arguing. I like the solution, but I'm >>> not sure if it's going to solve the problem for the reasons below. >>> >>> I'm sure they will show in the routing table as 7 different routes. >>> However, when CEF resolves adjacencies, there will still be only two >>> exits. While we may have the impression that we have 5:2 ratio by >>> looking into the RIB, are we _actually_ going to have it with the >>> traffic. >>> >>> Without generating the traffic and measuring the output, I'm not quite >>> sure how to test this... >>> >>> -- >>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert >>> >>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture >>> >>> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com >>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ >> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> Subscription information may be found at: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > Carlos G Mendioroz B <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> B LW7 EQI B Argentina Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Mon May 02 2011 - 16:40:17 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 01 2011 - 09:01:11 ART