Juan,
I would humbly suggest you lab it up to see how it works. After that you
may grow quite curious to read a bit of a theory background like RFCs
involved, i.e RFC 2858.
HTH
A.
On 4/27/2011 6:11 PM, Juan wrote:
> Many thanks Marko...
>
> Anyway, i have some doubts... If you configure dual stacking at the CEs you
> have on the ends of the ipv4....do you need to have a tunnel between the PEs
> to permit the ipv6 prefixes to pass the ipv4 core?
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
>
>
> 2011/4/26 Marko Milivojevic<markom_at_ipexpert.com>
>
>> You can use the same session with multiple address families - "ipv4
>> unicast" and "ipv6 unicast". Just to give you an example of this, you
>> can read the short blog I wrote on the subject couple of years ago:
>>
>> http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/06/09/ipv6-in-carrier-networks/
>>
>>
>> --
>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>>
>> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>>
>> Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this message are mine and my only
>> and not the official or unofficial opinion of, or affiliated with
>> IPexpert and its owners in any way.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:34,<fferrer10_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> Can you provide some help about how to pass with the same bgp session
>> IPv4&
>>> IPv6 prefixes through an IPv4 Mpls network? I read something about the
>> ipv6
>>> dual stacking capability of Cisco routers, but i am not sure if you can
>> have a
>>> bgp session passing the 2 types of prefixes at the same time (suppose we
>> need
>>> to comunicate 2 mixed environments, with ipv4& ipv6 hosts at both ends)
>>>
>>> TIA and best regards.
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Apr 27 2011 - 20:47:46 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun May 01 2011 - 09:00:29 ART