RE: BGP load balancing using Loopbacks.

From: David Prall <dcp_at_dcptech.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:25:40 -0400

Updated: Aug 23, 2005

I'd say that EIGRP has changed a little bit in the past 5+ years. Default
max paths use to be all over the place, it is now 4 for all IGP's. CEF
allows for 32 paths now as well.

David

--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Jacek
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 3:56 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: BGP load balancing using Loopbacks.
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> I am referring to Cisco article:
> 
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_configuration_exampl
> e09186a00800945bf.shtml#conf1
> 
> RA(AS11)======EIGRP======RB(AS10)
> 
> Peering is done using loopback interfaces.
> RA and RB run EIGRP and advertise Loopbacks and connecting links.
> Load balancing between loopback interfaces is assured by EIGRP.
> 
> My question is about Cisco statement:
> "This scenario shows how to achieve load sharing when there are
> multiple *(up
> to a maximum of six), equal-cost links*."
> 
> Why there is a limit of 6 links and why they need to be equal ?
> I think that any limits in this scenario are imposed by EIGRP and EIGRP
> supports unequal load balancing up to 16 links.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 26 2011 - 16:25:40 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun May 01 2011 - 09:00:29 ART