Re: Cisco 3560 - behavior

I agree. People should not respond so quickly on behaviors that change over
time. You could end up disagreeing about 2 completely different time frames.

Make this a professional discussion instead of leading with pride and
arrogance. Or at least..that is what is being perceived. I'm sure No One
intended to be patronizing. At least, I hope not.

Yes. Even a CCIE needs to be reminded of some facts as or if they change.

Paul

-- 
Paul Negron
CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752
Senior Technical Instructor
www.micronicstraining.com
> From: Muzammil Malick <malickmuz_at_gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Muzammil Malick <malickmuz_at_gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:13:12 +0100
> To: Steve Di Bias <sdibias_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: Stephen Robinson <stephen.robinson_at_qtzl.com>, JB Poplawski
> <jb.poplawski_at_gmail.com>, Max Pierson <nmaxpierson_at_gmail.com>, "Engr.
> Jagdeesh. K. Vasvani" <jk_vasvani_at_hotmail.com>, group-study
> <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: Cisco 3560 - behavior
> 
> So are you saying that an access port today will accept tagged traffic
> as long as it is tagged with the vlan assigned to the access port?
> 
> This is contradictory to the documentation and everything else I have read.
> 
> I had always understood that any tagged traffic will be dropped regardless?
> 
> On 11 April 2011 20:04, Steve Di Bias <sdibias_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Of course, nobody knows everything, so fair enough.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The behavior today would be to forward any untagged frames or frames tagged
>> with a vlan id of the access vlan while denying everything else.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This wasn't always the case however, and I believe that older OS versions
>> will actually forward the tagged frames as well.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Stephen Robinson <
>> stephen.robinson_at_qtzl.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Sounds like none of you know the answer either...   HaHAHa....
>>> 
>>> Better to make fun than be productive...   :)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Jagdeesh -   sorry for the ridicule of my peers.  I speculate (but do not
>>> know)  that you could not pass a vlan tag on an access port but I'm not
>>> sure
>>> if it would drop or if it would just strip the tag.
>>> 
>>> Steve-Max-JP  care to step up and try to answer?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> BTW -  a ccie number does not mean you know everything....  And who better
>>> to ask than other smart people like this list.    even Narbik and Scott
>>> don't know everything (I mean...   in theory there may be something that
>>> they don't know...   Of course I can't prove it)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> From: JB Poplawski <jb.poplawski_at_gmail.com>
>>>> Reply-To: JB Poplawski <jb.poplawski_at_gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:09:07 -0500
>>>> To: Max Pierson <nmaxpierson_at_gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: Steve Di Bias <sdibias_at_gmail.com>, "Engr. Jagdeesh. K. Vasvani"
>>>> <jk_vasvani_at_hotmail.com>, group-study <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: Cisco 3560 - behavior
>>>> 
>>>> I just re-read that...  yikes!
>>>> JB
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Max Pierson <nmaxpierson_at_gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Does your signature say CCIE?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Lol, i was thinking the same thing. It must be from a pass4sure cert
>>> :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Steve Di Bias <sdibias_at_gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Does your signature say CCIE?
>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2011 9:59 AM, "Engr. Jagdeesh. K. Vasvani" <
>>>>>> jk_vasvani_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Dear Experts,
>>>>>>> Would appreciate if anyone could help by clarifying below queries:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 1. how would a cisco switch reacts when it receives a tagged Frame on
>>> an
>>>>>>> Access Port.
>>>>>>> 2. Does switch pass each & every frame b/w access ports in vlan x,
>>> where
>>>>>> one
>>>>>>> is configured with " switchport voice vlan x" and other with
>>> "switchport
>>>>>>> access vlan x"
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> REgards,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jagdeesh. K. Vasvani
>>>>>>> CCIE# 28213 (R&S)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> -Steve Di Bias
>> 
>> 
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> 
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net