Can you try getting around with the PPPOE client config?
loo100 -- > 10.100.40.2 255.255.255.255
dialer 1 -- > unnumbered loo100
then link fa0/0 to the dialer pool
You should then use the /32 network in statement in the BGP section.
I just tried it and able to advertise the /32. Sorry if I missed some
details in you requirement
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Mathew <mathewfer_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Thank you for the reply.
>
> No, I did not try because I am trying to find a way to get /32. Reason
> is that this project involve many routers & we are limited with IPs.
>
> Any more ideas?
>
>
> Mathew
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Aaron <aaron1_at_gvtc.com> wrote:
> > You tried a /31?
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> > On Mar 30, 2011, at 6:21 PM, Mathew <mathewfer_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Hubert/All,
> >>
> >> I tried the sub-interface options you suggested but it did not work,
> >> see below. I tried before to enter /32 IP under main Ethernet
> >> interface & it did not take /32 IP & it seems same with a
> >> sub-interface too.
> >>
> >> Any other ideas are welcome as I have ran out of options but I believe
> >> there should be a way to do this too.
> >>
> >> R2(config)#int FastEthernet0/0.1
> >>
> >> R2(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1Q 1
> >> R2(config-subif)#ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255
> >> Bad mask /32 for address 2.2.2.2
> >> R2(config-subif)#ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.252
> >> R2(config-subif)#do sho runn int FastEthernet0/0.1
> >> Building configuration...
> >>
> >> Current configuration : 101 bytes
> >> !
> >> interface FastEthernet0/0.1
> >> encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
> >> ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.252
> >> end
> >>
> >> R2(config-subif)#
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Mathew
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Hubert Hinsley
> >> <hubert.hinsley_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hello, would it be possible to achieve the solution via subinterfaces
> on the
> >>> router ethernet interface? One with a /32 address and one with a /24?
> Or,
> >>> possibly via primary and secondary ip addresses on the same interface?
> >>> Apologies if I have misunderstood the question.Regards, Hubert.
> >>>
> >>> On 30 Mar 2011 20:53, "Mathew" <mathewfer_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Stephen,
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for the reply.
> >>> Yes, I need to be advertise in BGP. So unfortunately, PPP idea can not
> >>> be used here.
> >>>
> >>> Mathew
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> Mathew,
> >>>>
> >>>> Does it...
> >>>
> >>>> Sr. Technical Instructor
> >>>> Ask about our FREE Lab Voucher with our Boot Camps
> >>>> YES! We take Cisco...
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Mathew
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Mathew
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Mathew
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Mar 30 2011 - 17:47:31 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 01 2011 - 06:35:42 ART