Re: Command Preference?

LOL, right?!?

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:57 AM, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> this seems to be one of those things that goes under why doesnt Cisco the
> great doer of magic just make this the default, to ignore the mtu...
>
> --
> Garry L. Baker
>
> "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine..." - RFC 1925
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Tyson,
> >
> >
> >
> > I see your point, and I totally respect it. But to me, telling the code
> to
> > ignore a check which maybe should not have been there to begin with is
> more
> > of a fix than a patch. But i could be wrong, i guess it all depends how
> you
> > look at it. But I definitely see what you are saying.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > ...although I would have said "instead of applying a patch to a
> problem"
> > :)
> > >
> > > OSPF does this on purpouse, to test link is viable to carry small
> > (hellos)
> > > and large packets. Disabling the test is like silencing the alarm,
> > problem
> > > is still there, might byte you later.
> > >
> > > -Carlos
> > >
> > > Tyson Scott @ 29/03/2011 03:05 -0300 dixit:
> > >
> > > system mtu routing fixes a problem instead of applying a fix to a
> > problem.
> > >> Obviously you will always have to follow the lab requirements but my
> > >> preference is simply a mindset. Just like with a real network.
> > >> Preferably
> > >> you will fix the underlying issues by fixing the design instead of
> > >> applying "
> > >> CCIE" tactics to work around issues.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:larryh12203_at_gmail.com]
> > >> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 5:24 PM
> > >> To: Narbik Kocharians
> > >> Cc: Tyson Scott; Cisco certification; ALL From_NJ
> > >> Subject: Re: Command Preference?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Ok, I have to ask, Tyson, why do you prefer the system mtu routing
> 1500
> > >> choice?
> > >>
> > >> I would recommend to be careful with the wording of the requirement if
> > >> this
> > >> was in a lab setting to be sure which one they were asking you to use.
> > >>
> > >> The requirement might say - Do not disable mismatch detection on
> > >> receiving
> > >> DBD packets which would lead one to use the system mtu routing choice.
> > >>
> > >> If the requirement said - do not use any global configuration command
> to
> > >> allow
> > >> the OSPF relationship to form, then that would lead to using the ip
> ospf
> > >> mtu-ignore command.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> Larry Hadrava
> > >> CCIE #12203
> > >> Check Out MyBlog: http://ccie12203.wordpress.com/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "Narbik Kocharians" <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
> > >> To: "ALL From_NJ" <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
> > >> Cc: "Tyson Scott" <tscott_at_ipexpert.com>, "Cisco certification"
> > >> <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> > >> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 5:10:10 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> > >> Subject: Re: Command Preference?
> > >>
> > >> The only reason i liked the "ip ospf mtu-ignore" is just incase i have
> > to
> > >> establish an OSPF session with another box. If this is configured,
> then,
> > i
> > >> don't have to worry about it. But i am sure we all have our reasons
> why
> > we
> > >> chose one option versus the other.
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:23 PM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Thanks everyone! I appreciate hearing your perspectives!
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> .
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Tyson Scott <tscott_at_ipexpert.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> I prefer the first.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf
> > Of
> > >>>> ALL
> > >>>> From_NJ
> > >>>> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 9:01 PM
> > >>>> To: Cisco certification
> > >>>> Subject: Re: Command Preference?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ok, sent too soon ... sorry about that.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If you are allow to use either, do you have a preference when
> peering
> > >>>>
> > >>> with
> > >>>
> > >>>> a
> > >>>> switch?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> system mtu routing 1500
> > >>>> or
> > >>>> ip ospf ignore-mtu
> > >>>>
> > >>>> seems that setting the system mtu routing might save you some
> trouble
> > >>>>
> > >>> later
> > >>>
> > >>>> on ...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Your thoughts?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Andrew
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I know either one will work IF YOU ARE ALLOWED
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> > >>>>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> > >>>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > >>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> > >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> > >>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >>>
> > >>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> > >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> *Narbik Kocharians
> > >> *CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> > >> www.MicronicsTraining.com <http://www.micronicstraining.com/> <
> > http://www.micronicstraining.com/> <
> > >> http://www.micronicstraining.com/>
> > >> Sr. Technical Instructor
> > >> *Ask about our FREE Lab Voucher with our Boot Camps*
> > >> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
> > >> Training & Remote Racks available
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >>
> > >>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > >> Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >>
> > >>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > >> Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > > --
> > > Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Narbik Kocharians
> > *CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> > www.MicronicsTraining.com <http://www.micronicstraining.com/> <
> > http://www.micronicstraining.com/>
> > Sr. Technical Instructor
> > *Ask about our FREE Lab Voucher with our Boot Camps*
> > YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
> > Training & Remote Racks available
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
-Steve Di Bias
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net