I usually ignore the MTU size myself, however modifying the MTU on your Cats
for just routing also makes sense. In the long run ignoring the MTU is less
of a hassle (no reload) and hasn't failed me yet!
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:01 PM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> ok, sent too soon ... sorry about that.
>
> If you are allow to use either, do you have a preference when peering with
> a
> switch?
>
> system mtu routing 1500
> or
> ip ospf ignore-mtu
>
> seems that setting the system mtu routing might save you some trouble later
> on ...
>
> Your thoughts?
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
> > I know either one will work IF YOU ARE ALLOWED
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Lee Lissitz
> > all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- -Steve Di Bias Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sun Mar 27 2011 - 21:19:04 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 01 2011 - 06:35:42 ART