Hi All
As far as I know (from readings etc) :
1) In case of MSTP - PVSTP inter-op scenarios ; we should either have
[A] root for all vlans (all instances) in MST region
[B] root for all vlans on PVST switch
2) Having root for half vlans in MST region and half on PVST switch is not a
valid scenario and we will see PVST_Inc error in this .
3) Best practice suggest having root in MSTP region
4) However there is no stopping having root on PVST switch as well .
Now My problem is following (My intent is to get SW2 PVST switch as root):
SW-1 (MSTP) g1/1---------------------g1/1- SW-2(PVST)
g1/2---------------------g1/2
SW1 config
===========
spanning-tree mode mst
spanning-tree extend system-id
!
spanning-tree mst configuration
name aa
revision 10
instance 1 vlan 1-5
instance 2 vlan 6-10
!
spanning-tree mst 1 priority 8192
spanning-tree mst 2 config 32768
SW2 config
========
!
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
spanning-tree vlan 1-4094 priority 4096
!
At SW1 ; I am getting following error :
C4924(config)#
*Mar 26 06:39:35.735: %SPANTREE-2-PVSTSIM_FAIL: Blocking root port Gi1/1:
Inconsitent inferior PVST BPDU received on VLAN 2, claiming root
2:0024.1430.2f00
C4924#sh span mst 1
##### MST1 vlans mapped: 1-5
Bridge address 001d.450d.0700 priority 8193 (8192 sysid 1)
Root this switch for MST1
Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
---------------- ---- --- --------- --------
--------------------------------
Gi1/1 Mstr BKN*20000 144.1 P2p Bound(PVST) *PVST_Inc
Gi1/2 Altn BLK 20000 128.2 P2p Bound(PVST)
C4924#sh span mst 2
##### MST2 vlans mapped: 6-10
Bridge address 001d.450d.0700 priority 32770 (32768 sysid 2)
Root this switch for MST2
Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
---------------- ---- --- --------- --------
--------------------------------
Gi1/1 Mstr BKN*20000 128.1 P2p Bound(PVST) *PVST_Inc
Gi1/2 Altn BLK 20000 128.2 P2p Bound(PVST)
Please let me know where am i wrong ?
Thanks
Gaurav Madan
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Mar 26 2011 - 13:15:41 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 01 2011 - 06:35:42 ART