RE: MSLQoS marking IP Prec from one SVI to another SVI on 3560

From: David Prall <dcp_at_dcptech.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:41:21 -0400

On a 6500 you use an ingress policer to accomplish this with
set-prec-transmit. I'm afraid this is different from platform to platform,
but all are semi close. I always pull out Kevin Turek's Networkers
presentation for this kind of stuff. The QoS SRND should have examples of
this as well.

David

--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Ladee Geek
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 9:26 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: MSLQoS marking IP Prec from one SVI to another SVI on 3560
> 
> Ummm that would be a title of MLSQoS ;-)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Ladee Geek <ladeegeek_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >     I am trying to find a way to set the IP Precedence on traffic
> leaving
> > one SVI and received on another.  I've tried all kind of things.  So
> many I
> > can't even remember the details any more.  lol.  I don't care if it's
> an
> > output or an input policy.  I just have not been able to find one
> that works
> > for traffic on the same SW from one SVI to another.
> >
> > I do have traffic going all the way through with the IP prec set.  So
> this
> > is not a matter of the qos getting stripped off.  Right now I have a
> policy
> > on R1 setting the ip prec to 3.  On R4 I have another policy setting
> the IP
> > prec to 4.  I'm trying to get svi to svi MQC to work here.
> >
> > 1.  This didn't work as either an input or output.  As an output the
> sw
> > took the config, but it didn't show up on the interface.
> >
> > Policy-map TEST
> >
> > class class-default
> >
> > set ip prec 2
> >
> > interface vlan 234
> >
> >      service-policy input TEST
> >
> > OR
> >
> > interface vlan 234
> >
> >      service-policy output TEST
> >
> > 2.  This didn't work.  I got an error stating that the child policy
> can
> > only match a physical input interface.
> >
> > class-map match-all vlan
> >
> > match input-interface  Vlan234
> >
> > Policy-map CHILD
> >
> > class vlan
> >
> > Policy-map PARENT
> >
> > class class-default
> >
> > set ip prec 2
> >
> > service-policy CHILD
> >
> > interface vlan 234
> >
> >      service-policy input TEST
> >
> > 3.  This didn't work as an output on the physical interface.  That is
> not
> > permitted.
> >
> > Policy-map TEST
> >
> > class class-default
> >
> > set ip prec 2
> >
> > *the topology*
> >
> > rR4---Sw1---Sw2---(vl 234) Sw3/Sw4 (vl 243) ---Sw1--- R3 - that's the
> > physical topology
> >
> > R4---Sw1---Sw3/Sw4---R3 is the logical topology
> >
> > Config on R4
> >
> > class-map match-all test1
> >
> > policy-map test1
> >
> > class test1
> >
> > class class-default
> >
> >   set ip precedence 3
> >
> > Config on Sw1
> >
> > class-map match-all test1
> >
> > match access-group 199
> >
> >
> >
> > policy-map test
> >
> > class test1
> >
> > class class-default
> >
> >   set precedence 4
> >
> >
> >
> > *Serenity NOW!!*
> >
> > thanks for the input!
> > --
> > r/
> > LG
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> r/
> LG
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Mar 17 2011 - 21:41:21 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 01 2011 - 06:35:41 ART