The aggregate label is created for a network that is on the PE and is within
a VRF. The interface connected to the CE or a loopback with the VRF applied
to it would be a good example of this.
Lab it UP!!!
Paul
-- Paul Negron CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752 Senior Technical Instructor www.micronicstraining.com > From: John Neiberger <jneiberger_at_gmail.com> > Reply-To: John Neiberger <jneiberger_at_gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:29:51 -0700 > To: Aaron <aaron1_at_gvtc.com> > Cc: CCIE KID <eliteccie_at_gmail.com>, Cisco certification > <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> > Subject: Re: MPLS Aggregate label > > I know virtually nothing about mpls, but isn't this the way PHP works? > It's my understanding that a router advertises the imp-null label for > directly connected interfaces so that the penultimate router will pop > the last label. Is that correct? Or am I completely in the wrong > ballpark? lol > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Aaron <aaron1_at_gvtc.com> wrote: >> Just saw this in my lab today... imp-null seems to have some correlation to >> connected routes.... perhaps someone can shed some light on this >> fact/observation... >> >> R6#sh mpls ip binding >> 10.10.10.0/24 >> in label: imp-null >> 140.100.0.0/27 >> in label: 24 >> 140.100.0.32/27 >> in label: 23 >> 140.100.0.64/28 >> in label: 20 >> 140.100.0.84/30 >> in label: 22 >> 140.100.0.88/30 >> in label: 21 >> 140.100.1.0/24 >> in label: 25 >> 140.100.2.0/24 >> in label: imp-null >> 140.100.3.0/24 >> in label: imp-null >> 151.100.0.0/15 >> in label: 34 >> 172.16.0.0/16 >> in label: 26 >> 192.128.128.0/24 >> in label: 19 >> 199.199.1.0/24 >> in label: 29 >> 199.199.2.0/24 >> in label: 28 >> 199.199.3.0/24 >> in label: 27 >> 199.199.4.0/24 >> in label: 33 >> 199.199.5.0/24 >> in label: 32 >> 199.199.6.0/24 >> in label: 31 >> 199.199.7.0/24 >> in label: 30 >> 199.199.8.0/24 >> in label: 18 >> 199.199.9.0/24 >> in label: 17 >> 199.199.10.0/24 >> in label: 16 >> R6# >> R6# >> R6# >> R6#sh ip ro con >> R6#sh ip ro connected >> 140.100.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 8 subnets, 4 masks >> C 140.100.2.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 >> C 140.100.3.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1 >> 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets >> C 10.10.10.0 is directly connected, Ethernet4/0 >> R6# >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of CCIE >> KID >> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 5:18 AM >> To: Cisco certification >> Subject: MPLS Aggregate label >> >> Hey what is the difference between Aggregate label ,implicit null and >> explicit null label in MPLS >> >> >> -- >> With Warmest Regards, >> >> CCIE KID >> IN PURSUIT OF CCIE >> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> Subscription information may be found at: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> Subscription information may be found at: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Wed Mar 09 2011 - 14:45:45 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 01 2011 - 06:35:41 ART