Re: mpls pe-ce

Those are best practices, cisco thinks: the ce side is really simple and small, then RIP does the job, it is simple to setup and troubleshoot but at the end of the day any igp would accomplish it, is really up to you to decide.

Sent using my Iphone

Em 09/03/2011, C s 12:28, "Aaron" <aaron1_at_gvtc.com> escreveu:

> " A service provider edge (PE) router can learn an IP prefix from a customer
> edge (CE) router by static configuration, through a BGP session with the CE
> router, or through the routing information protocol (RIP) exchange with the
> CE router. "
>
>
>
> Is it just me or have y'all also read statements like this before? It seems
> that I see RIP mentioned a lot when speaking of an IGP route prot that can
> be used from CE to PE...does this mean I can't use eigrp, ospf ?
>
>
>
> Aaron
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Mar 09 2011 - 12:40:29 ART