RE: bpdufilter and bpduguard

From: Laidlaw, Patrick A. <Patrick.Laidlaw_at_wwt.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:57:59 -0600

Yuri,

What is your goal in using these configurations? Answer us that before we give you recommendations. What is the scenario that dictates the need for these features.

IE bpdufilter I would use if connecting to a service provider.
IE bpduguard I would use out to end user workstations that I want to ensure there not placing a hub or switch or to protect from the infamous user plugging both ports of an ipphone into the wall jacks.

Patrick

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Cisco Fanatic
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 10:46 AM
To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: bpdufilter and bpduguard

This might have been asked multiple times. I understand the differences, but
could not really convenience myself is what recommendation should I follow

!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/38
 switchport access vlan 10
 switchport mode access
 spanning-tree portfast
 spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
 spanning-tree bpduguard enable
!

Or,
!
spanning-tree portfast bpdufilter default
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/38
 switchport access vlan 10
 switchport mode access
 spanning-tree portfast
  spanning-tree bpduguard enable
!

The second option looks promising to me as bpduguard will take precedence and
will put the port in err-disable state before BPDUFilter can transition the
port back to normal.

-Yuri

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Mar 01 2011 - 12:57:59 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 01 2011 - 06:35:41 ART