I don't remember having to reload the router, but may be some
config sequence yields the router to a havoc state :)
-Carlos
ALL From_NJ @ 16/02/2011 09:36 -0300 dixit:
> I did try that, but that did not work. For some reason ppp could not
> negotiate ip, everything was set up right so I could not understand why
> it was happening. I figured what the heck, let me restart the router.
>
> Debug ppp negotiation showed that ip could not be sent ... something
> like ip packet output fail. since this was during the time that ppp
> would bind the interface ..., as part of the negotiation, I figured it
> must be internal.
>
> Your thoughts?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Feb 16, 2011 4:39 AM, "Carlos G Mendioroz" <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
> <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>> wrote:
> > Did you try bouncing the interfaces before that ? (i.e. shut/no shut)
> >
> > -Carlos
> >
> > ALL From_NJ @ 16/02/2011 01:55 -0300 dixit:
> >> This was an interesting lab test. Humm ... I am thinking of how this
> >> might help speed up any lab tasks ...
> >>
> >> For the life of me, I could not get IP up and going till I rebooted
> each
> >> router. Then all is happy ;-)
> >>
> >> The link I provide is a good one to go through.
> >>
> >> Thanks again gents
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:04 AM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
> <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
> >> <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Interesting question and answer. Some caveats as well ...
> >>
> >> Here is a link I found:
> >>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk759/technologies_white_paper09186a00801348bc.shtml
> >>
> >>
> >> I need to try this later today, this looks cool.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the Q&A guys!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Carlos G Mendioroz
> >> <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
> <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>> wrote:
> >>
> >> This depends on the speed of the interface, but if LFI is deemed
> >> necessary, a multilink will be created *on this router*.
> >> (LFI := Link Fragmentation & Interleaving)
> >> For this to work (again ?) you need a corresponding configuration
> >> on the other side of the link!
> >>
> >> -Carlos
> >>
> >> Hussam EL Kebbi @ 15/02/2011 05:40 -0300 dixit:
> >>
> >> Hi Experts,
> >> When we apply: auto qos voip command under interfaces, it
> >> will create
> >> multilink xxx with state down, and all commands are
> >> transferred to this
> >> multilink. Is this multilink stays down state? Can you
> >> please explain what do
> >> we expect?
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
> <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>>
> >> LW7 EQI Argentina
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> >> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
> <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> >> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
> <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>>
> >
> > --
> > Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>> LW7
> EQI Argentina
>
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Wed Feb 16 2011 - 09:47:31 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Mar 01 2011 - 07:01:50 ART