Re: IPS INLINE VLAN

From: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:05:13 -0300

Yes, that's one way of doing it.
Keep in mind that as long as you don't have a trunk between the
switches, you have two different "VLAN" universes.
I.e. vlan 2 @ ASA-SW has nothing to do with vlan 2 @ DMZ-SW.
(You better document it and have them match for the same use,
or you will have a hard time supporting this deployment)

-Carlos

estela Mathew @ 10/02/2011 10:46 -0300 dixit:
> Hello Carlos,
>
> Thanks for ur reply, please confirm the steps for my configuration,
>
> * Inline vlan pair between vlan 2 and vlan 3 on gig0/0 of IPS
>
> * Connect ASA-SW to DMZ-SW via a access link vlan 3 because the
> servers will be in vlan 2 and the ASA-SW port connecting to DMZ-SW
> will be in vlan 3.
>
> THE TRAFFIC FLOW
>
> Please confirm me if it is wrong
>
> * From Servers Traffic hitting to Default gateway i.e ASA-DMZ
> interface
> * IT will be hitting to vlan 2 on switch the broadcast will be on
> IPS the mapping of vlan2 and vlan 3 will broadcast on vlan 3
> * On vlan 3 ports of DMZ-SW broadcast will receive and will be
> forwarded to ASA-SW interface and to ASA on vlan 3.
>
>
> Please correct the above steps are correct,Waiting for ur replies friends
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Samuel Jack <jacksamuel32_at_gmail.com
> <mailto:jacksamuel32_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello Carlos,
>
> Very good Explanation.
>
> Can u explore more the below paragraph,i have understood but i want
> to be more clear,
>
>
> Do you have the same vlans in both switches already ? If not,
> the link can be an access link joining the ASA-SW DMZ vlan to
> a DMZ-SW outside vlan. Then create an inside vlan and put
> both (inside and outside) in a trunk port to the IPS.
>
>
> What i understood from ur above mail is
>
> 1. If I wanna go with inline vlan pair then inside and outside
> interface will be same
> 2. I have to connect ASA-SW to DMZ-SW .
>
>
> I have only 1 subnet can u explain me the traffic flow??
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz
> <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>> wrote:
>
> Estela,
> if you have to use an inline vlan pair, then inside and outside
> of the IPS are going to be in the same interface.
>
> You say you have two switches, you will have to connect them
> somehow,
> so both inside and outside can be vlans of the DMZ-switch.
>
> Do you have the same vlans in both switches already ? If not,
> the link can be an access link joining the ASA-SW DMZ vlan to
> a DMZ-SW outside vlan. Then create an inside vlan and put
> both (inside and outside) in a trunk port to the IPS.
>
> -Carlos
>
> estela Mathew @ 10/02/2011 03:52 -0300 dixit:
>
> Hello,
>
> Topology:
>
> ASA------>ASA-SW------->IPS-------->DMZ-SW-------->Servers
>
> I have a DMZ in my ASA i have kept IPS in between the ASA
> and Servers, I
> have IPS 4240 i want to configure inline vlan pair,How can i
> do it,
>
> IPS gig0/0 is connected to DMZ-SWITCH and IPS gig0/1 is
> connected to
> ASA-SWITCH what will be the vlan pair, I have only 1 subnet
> in DMZ
> 192.168.10.0/27 <http://192.168.10.0/27>.
>
> Please don't suggest IPS Inline interface pair becz i know
> it can work
> easily Customer is insisting me to do inline vlan pairing.
>
> I have seen the configuration example from cisco but still i
> have
> doubts,Suppose if i create a vlan pair between vlan 1 and
> vlan 2 on gig0/0
> then what pairing will be on gig0/1 which is connected to
> ASA-SW, ihave only
> 1 subnet in DMZ .
>
> Please help
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>
> LW7 EQI Argentina
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Feb 10 2011 - 11:05:13 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Mar 01 2011 - 07:01:50 ART