RE: Aggregation

Woops! Yes multiple aggregates required

Try:

192.168.10.0/23
192.168.12.0/22
192.168.16.0/22
192.168.20.0/24

-Aaron

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Carlos G Mendioroz
Sent: Tuesday, 8 February 2011 9:35 PM
To: Aaron Riemer
Cc: 'imran ali'; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: Re: Aggregation

Hmm, 192.168.12.0 /21 ?

-Carlos

Aaron Riemer @ 08/02/2011 10:10 -0300 dixit:
> 192.168.10.0/23
> 192.168.12.0/21
> 192.168.20.0/24
>
> Not possible to summarise exactly with one aggregate.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> imran ali
> Sent: Tuesday, 8 February 2011 8:28 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Aggregation
>
> Hi group
>
> we have the following networks 192.168.10.0 ---------192.168.20.0
>
> i need to summarize it as precisely as possible. use of up to there
> summarized routes are allowed .
>
> can any one plz give me exact summaries ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net