Re: Mpls

From: bimbo <bimbooloko_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 05:36:10 +0000

Yeah Marko,
 I guess it wld work but d issues is how do I change the router id in of d vrf
------Original Message------
From: Marko Milivojevic
To: bimbo
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Mpls
Sent: Feb 3, 2011 06:27

It will work if you manually change router-id in one of the VRFs.

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
Free CCIE Training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Community: http://www.ipexpert.com/communities
:: Sent from my phone. Apologies for errors and brevity. ::
On Feb 2, 2011, at 17:55, "bimbo" <bimbooloko_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi experts,
> I have this scenario, I know its possible but I can't just make it work.
> I have on a router 2 fast ethernet, connected back to back, ie f0/0 connected to f0/1. 
> The two fastethernet belongs to different vrf but in the same subnet. I tried forming a bgp neighbor btw the two vrf but it isn't working, telling "bgp-3- notification : sent to neigbor x.x.x.x.x bgp identifier wrong 4 bytes 03030303.
> 
> What can I do? Can it be becos ofb the fact dat d two vrfs are using the same router-id if yes is it possible for me to create different bgp router-id under each vrf.
> 
> I tried tweaking local as stuff but didn't work.
> 
> Thanks expert.
> Sent from my BlackBerry. Smartphone, from Etisalat Enjoy high speed internet service with Etisalat easy net, available at all our experience centres
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
>_______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Sent from my BlackBerry. Smartphone, from Etisalat Enjoy high speed internet service with Etisalat easy net, available at all our experience centres
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Feb 03 2011 - 05:36:10 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Mar 01 2011 - 07:01:49 ART