Re: Voice access port trunking

From: Babatunde Sanda <sbabatunde1_at_ca.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:38:17 -0800

It was in the earlier days prior to auxiliary / voice vlan that you need to configure such. Simply configuring your voice vlan identifier (switchp voice vlan no) is all you need to do now. This is not to say doing it now wouldn't work because technically the cisco phones have minimum switching capability but this isn't ideal. (security loophole etc).

I would say there are no professional advantages. More disadvantage. Think of all the disadvantage of having an unprotected switch on your network. The phone is not meant to carry any traffic other than voice with exception of the single tagged data traffic.

 Babatunde Sanda B.Sc (Acct.) CCNP, CCVP, CCNA(R,S,V), MCSA, N+, A+.
:: Sent from my Iphone. Apologies for errors and brevity. ::

On Jan 18, 2011, at 5:48 PM, emir d souza <emir979_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> I'm wondering which is the way to go trunk or non-trunked for voice access
> ports...to configure "switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q" or not? And what
> are the advantages/differences between the two? Am I missing out on
> something?
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Jan 18 2011 - 18:38:17 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Feb 01 2011 - 07:39:17 ART