Re: RD X:X:X It's a clean Question.:)

Yes This is correct. Is this documented somewhere that I may have missed.
But this makes perfect sense now. I appreciate the help. I may have gone
crazy if i saw that while doing the lab. This could have made me think Cisco
is playing a trick on me.

Thanks again,
Ben

On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:

> This is used for Cisco's implementation of multicast VPNs. You have
> them configured, right? The routes you see "leaking" are Loopback0 of
> PEs?
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 17:58, Ben Jules <bjules05_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Groupstudy,
> >
> > Has anyone ever seen a route distinguisher of 2:2:2 for example and what
> > cause the extra number:colon?
> > command used is show ip bgp vpn all
> >
> > let me mention this also. i see an ipv4 route leaking into my vpnv4 table
> > with this rd. Bug? Has anyone seen this before?
> >
> > ROM: ROMMON Emulation Microcode
> > BOOTLDR: 7200 Software (C7200-K91P-M), Version 12.2(25)S13, RELEASE
> SOFTWARE
> > (fc1)
> > Thanks for your help
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Jan 10 2011 - 07:32:42 ART