RE: DMVPN Spokes

From: sameer inam <i_sameer_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 11:40:27 +0000

ok let me try that will get back to you ..

thank you very much for every one for kind help

Sameer

> From: tscott_at_ipexpert.com
> To: i_sameer_at_hotmail.com; negron.paul_at_gmail.com; dcp_at_dcptech.com;
amsoares_at_netcabo.pt; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: DMVPN Spokes
> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 12:26:26 +0530
>
> Simplify and use dual hub single network. Here is the configuration for
> you.
>
> i.e.
> Hub1
> interface Tunnel1
> ip mtu 1400
> ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
> ip nhrp map multicast dynamic
> ip nhrp map multicast <second-hub-nbma>
> ip nhrp map ip 192.168.1.2 <second-hub-nbma>
> ip nhrp nhs 192.168.1.2
> ip nhrp network-id 12
> ip nhrp redirect
> ip nhrp shortcut
> tunnel mode gre multipoint
> tunnel path-mtu-discovery
> tunnel source <outside-interface>
>
> Hub2
> interface Tunnel1
> ip mtu 1400
> ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
> ip nhrp map multicast dynamic
> ip nhrp map multicast <first-hub-nbma>
> ip nhrp map ip 192.168.1.1 <first-hub-nbma>
> ip nhrp nhs 192.168.1.1
> ip nhrp network-id 12
> ip nhrp redirect
> ip nhrp shortcut
> tunnel mode gre multipoint
> tunnel path-mtu-discovery
> tunnel source <outside-interface>
>
> Spoke1
> interface Tunnel1
> ip mtu 1400
> ip address 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0
> ip nhrp map multicast <first-hub-nbma>
> ip nhrp map multicast <second-hub-nbma>
> ip nhrp map ip 192.168.1.1 <first-hub-nbma>
> ip nhrp map ip 192.168.1.2 <second-hub-nbma>
> ip nhrp nhs 192.168.1.1
> ip nhrp nhs 192.168.1.2
> ip nhrp network-id 12
> ip nhrp redirect
> ip nhrp shortcut
> tunnel mode gre multipoint
> tunnel path-mtu-discovery
> tunnel source <outside-interface>
>
> If using OSPF do the following on all three:
> ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
>
> If using EIGRP do the following on the hubs. Personally I recommend OSPF
> though:
> no ip split-horizon eigrp <as>
>
> I didn't show the IPsec encryption parameters as you can decide whether you
> want to use GetVPN or IPsec profiles.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
> Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Mailto: tscott_at_ipexpert.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> sameer inam
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:08 AM
> To: negron.paul_at_gmail.com; dcp_at_dcptech.com; amsoares_at_netcabo.pt;
> ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: DMVPN Spokes
>
> i m using 2811 at first Hub and 1841 router on second hub ... spoke site
> 1841
> router
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 11:55:29 -0700
> > Subject: Re: DMVPN Spokes
> > From: negron.paul_at_gmail.com
> > To: dcp_at_dcptech.com; i_sameer_at_hotmail.com; amsoares_at_netcabo.pt;
> ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >
> > What Hardware are you using for your hub?
> > --
> > Paul Negron
> > CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752
> > Senior Technical Instructor
> > www.micronicstraining.com
> >
> >
> >
> > > From: David Prall <dcp_at_dcptech.com>
> > > Organization: DCP Technologies
> > > Reply-To: David Prall <dcp_at_dcptech.com>
> > > Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:44:57 -0500
> > > To: 'sameer inam' <i_sameer_at_hotmail.com>, <amsoares_at_netcabo.pt>,
> > > <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> > > Subject: RE: DMVPN Spokes
> > >
> > > Can't tell you without knowing more. At this point - Upgrade to the
> latest
> > > code and if you continue to have the issue send "sh tech"'s and drawing
> of
> > > the network.
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://dcp.dcptech.com
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: sameer inam [mailto:i_sameer_at_hotmail.com]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 1:32 PM
> > >> To: dcp_at_dcptech.com; amsoares_at_netcabo.pt; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > >> Subject: RE: DMVPN Spokes
> > >>
> > >> I m using OSPF routing protocol.its looke like there is no routing
loop
> > >> . the issue which I seen is packet has be lost after some time to
> > >> there destination .I can see when the One ping to DMVPN hub stopped
and
> > >> other one working fine at that crypto keep up . NHRP stable but ping
> > >> repsoned stopped with one hub and other one worked fine ...
> > >>
> > >> if you could advice me how we can fix this issue it will be much
> > >> appreciated.
> > >>
> > >> Sameer
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> From: dcp_at_dcptech.com
> > >>> To: i_sameer_at_hotmail.com; amsoares_at_netcabo.pt; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > >>> Subject: RE: DMVPN Spokes
> > >>> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 10:36:51 -0500
> > >>>
> > >>> Fails after 30 minutes, 30 minutes exactly? What timer is kicking off
> > >> at 30
> > >>> Minutes, ISAKMP is 24 Hours by default, IPSec is 1 hour by default,
> > >> Routing
> > >>> Protocols are nowhere near 30 minutes (15 seconds EIGRP, 40 seconds
> > >> OSPF),
> > >>> NHRP Holdtime is 2 hours by default.
> > >>>
> > >>> What routing protocol are you using?
> > >>> What do your configs actually look like?
> > >>> What does your routing table look like, are you creating a routing
> > >> loop that
> > >>> is causing other issues?
> > >>>
> > >>> David
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> http://dcp.dcptech.com
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
> > >> Behalf Of
> > >>>> sameer inam
> > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 8:23 AM
> > >>>> To: amsoares_at_netcabo.pt; dcp_at_dcptech.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > >>>> Subject: RE: DMVPN Spokes
> > >>>>
> > >>>> have one spoke router two different hub ...no i havent try vrf ...
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> From: amsoares_at_netcabo.pt
> > >>>>> To: i_sameer_at_hotmail.com; dcp_at_dcptech.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > >>>>> Subject: RE: DMVPN Spokes
> > >>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:19:24 +0000
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> So you want to simulate several spokes on a single router ? Have
> > >> you
> > >>>> tried
> > >>>>> using VRF's ?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S/SP)
> > >>>>> amsoares_at_netcabo.pt
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
> > >> Behalf
> > >>>> Of
> > >>>>> sameer inam
> > >>>>> Sent: terga-feira, 4 de Janeiro de 2011 12:34
> > >>>>> To: dcp_at_dcptech.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > >>>>> Subject: RE: DMVPN Spokes
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I tried all the option which you told me .. its worked for 30 min
> > >> and
> > >>>> then
> > >>>>> one
> > >>>>> of the tunnel drops. any advice
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> From: dcp_at_dcptech.com
> > >>>>>> To: i_sameer_at_hotmail.com
> > >>>>>> Subject: RE: DMVPN Spokes
> > >>>>>> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 16:25:31 -0500
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> You'll need different nhrp id's and tunnel key's if they are
> > >> using
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>> same
> > >>>>>> source address/interface. If using tunnel protection you will
> > >> need
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>>> shared keyword. You should be able to look at the DMVPN SRND on
> > >>>> dual
> > >>>>> tunnel
> > >>>>>> dual dmvpn designs.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> http://dcp.dcptech.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>>> From: sameer inam [mailto:i_sameer_at_hotmail.com]
> > >>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 3:45 PM
> > >>>>>>> To: dcp_at_dcptech.com
> > >>>>>>> Subject: RE: DMVPN Spokes
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> ok , I tried to use different Key , different profile
> > >> protection
> > >>>> (but
> > >>>>>>> Not with Shared) different Netwrk ID on both tunnels .but
> > >> source
> > >>>>>>> tunnel is same ,, I will try to use different Source and also
> > >>>> shared
> > >>>>>>> key wordward with profile protection , Do you have any
> > >> document
> > >>>> for
> > >>>>>>> that ? I really appreaicte your kind help
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Sameer
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> From: dcp_at_dcptech.com
> > >>>>>>>> To: ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com; i_sameer_at_hotmail.com;
> > >>>>>>> ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > >>>>>>>> Subject: RE: DMVPN Spokes
> > >>>>>>>> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 15:38:03 -0500
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> If they are using the same source address/inteface then you
> > >>>> will have
> > >>>>>>> to use
> > >>>>>>>> the shared keyword on tunnel protection. You will also need
> > >> to
> > >>>> use
> > >>>>>>> tunnel
> > >>>>>>>> keys on both interfaces so that packets are dropped off on
> > >> the
> > >>>>>>> correct
> > >>>>>>>> tunnel. Otherwise you need to use dedicated source
> > >> interfaces
> > >>>> for
> > >>>>>>> each
> > >>>>>>>> tunnel interface, such as a loopback for each.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> David
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> http://dcp.dcptech.com
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>>>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> > >> [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
> > >>>>>>> Behalf Of
> > >>>>>>>>> ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 3:29 PM
> > >>>>>>>>> To: sameer inam; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: DMVPN Spokes
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Google for cisco's dmvpn srnd
> > >>>>>>>>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>>>>> From: sameer inam <i_sameer_at_hotmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 20:16:33
> > >>>>>>>>> To: <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com>; <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> > >>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: DMVPN Spokes
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I tried with different DMVPN domain , Network-ID and Key
> > >> and
> > >>>> also
> > >>>>>>>>> different profile but issue Tunnel was up for while and
> > >> then
> > >>>>>>> droped.
> > >>>>>>>>> could you please advice any document ?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for your help
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Sameer
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: DMVPN Spokes
> > >>>>>>>>>> To: i_sameer_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > >>>>>>>>>> From: ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>>>> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 20:18:58 +0000
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Yes. Each tunnel will be in a different dmvpn domain.
> > >>>>>>>>>> ------Original Message------
> > >>>>>>>>>> From: sameer inam
> > >>>>>>>>>> Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> > >>>>>>>>>> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > >>>>>>>>>> ReplyTo: sameer inam
> > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: DMVPN Spokes
> > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Jan 1, 2011 15:09
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Dear Experts,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I have one router whichis on Spoke end , and I have two
> > >>>> different
> > >>>>>>>>> DMVPN Hubs
> > >>>>>>>>>> , can I configure two spokes configuration on one
> > >> single
> > >>>> router ?
> > >>>>>>>>> please
> > >>>>>>>>>> advice ?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Sameer
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
Received on Wed Jan 05 2011 - 11:40:27 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Feb 01 2011 - 07:39:17 ART